Paper · 2021 · Antioxidants

Nitric Oxide as a Remedy against Oxidative Damages in Apple Seeds Undergoing Accelerated Ageing

Katarzyna Ciacka; Marcin Tyminski; Agnieszka Gniazdowska; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seed ageing is associated with a high concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) seeds belong to the orthodox type. Due to a deep dormancy, they may be stored in dry condition at 5 °C for a long time, without viability loss. In the laboratory, artificial ageing of apple seeds is performed by imbibition in wet sand at warm temperature (33 °C). The aim of the work was to study nitric oxide (NO) as a seed vigour preservation agent. Embryos isolated from apple seeds subjected to accelerated ageing for 7, 14, 21 or 40 days were fumigated with NO. Embryo quality was estimated by TTC and MDA tests. ROS level was confirmed by NBT staining. We analysed the alteration in transcript levels of CAT, SOD and POX. NO fumigation of embryos of seeds aged for 21 days stimulated germination and increased ROS level which correlated to the elevated expression of RBOH. The increased total antioxidant capacity after NO fumigation was accompanied by the increased transcript levels of genes encoding enzymatic antioxidants, that could protect against ROS overaccumulation. Moreover, post-aged NO application diminished the nitro-oxidative modification of RNA, proving NO action as a remedy in oxidative remodelling after seeds ageing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO fumigation stimulated germination of embryos from seeds aged 21 days.

Treatment
NO fumigatione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
aged for 21 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO fumigation of embryos of seeds aged for 21 days stimulated germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO fumigation increased ROS level in embryos from seeds aged 21 days.

Treatment
NO fumigatione0
Outcome
ROS levele0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
aged for 21 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO fumigation of embryos of seeds aged for 21 days stimulated germination and increased ROS level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased ROS was correlated with elevated RBOH expression.

Gene
RBOHe0
Outcome
ROS levele0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased ROS level which correlated to the elevated expression of RBOH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO fumigation increased total antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
NO fumigatione0
Outcome
total antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased total antioxidant capacity after NO fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO fumigation increased transcript levels of genes encoding enzymatic antioxidants.

Treatment
NO fumigatione0
Gene
genes encoding enzymatic antioxidantse0
Outcome
transcript levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after NO fumigation was accompanied by the increased transcript levels of genes encoding enzymatic antioxidants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-aged NO application diminished nitro-oxidative RNA modification.

Treatment
post-aged NO applicatione0
Outcome
nitro-oxidative modification of RNAe0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-aged NO application diminished the nitro-oxidative modification of RNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitric oxide · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

solarization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.