Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The percentages of three wireworm populations that became labeled were similar across seed treatments with 15, 25 and 35% Rb and across samples taken 2 to 32 d after planting.

A claim from Seed Treatment with Rubidium for Monitoring Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Feeding on Corn · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentages of three wireworm populations that became labeled were similar across seed treatments with 15, 25 and 35% Rb and across samples taken 2 to 32 d after planting.

Treatment
seed treatments containing 15, 25, and 35% Rbe1
Interactor
wireworme1pest
Outcome
Percentages of three wireworm populations that became labelede1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field evaluations, corn was labeled at time of planting and remained labeled for ≤32 d after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–450
e1

“Percentages of three wireworm populations that became labeled were similar in plots that received seed treatments containing 15, 25, and 35% Rb and in samples obtained between 2 and 32 d after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–965

Title

Seed Treatment with Rubidium for Monitoring Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Feeding on Corn

J. M. Cheshire; A. J. Keaster; R. H. Ward; et al. Environmental Entomology 1987. doi:10.1093/ee/16.2.475

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e305d9d90cd9dea1288fef5805ffe08cc8a013358b600201d60d383d86543792 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.