Abstract
Summary: Résumé: Zusammenfassung In glasshouse experiments 1,8‐naphthalic anhydride (NA) as a seed dressing, and N,N‐diallyl‐2,2‐dichloroacetamide (R25788), either as a seed dressing or mixed in the spray tank with the herbicide, protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage. When applied after maize emergence, R25788 was not effective through the foliage but had to reach the soil to provide protection. Soil drench treatments of R25788 countered barban damage successfully if applied up to 7 days prior to spraying or up to one day after. Delay of application to 2 or 3 days after barban resulted in only partial protection. Neither NA nor R25788 completely protected barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) or oats ( Avena saliva L.) from a subsequent barban spray. Interactions entre le barbane et des produils protecteurs sur le maïs, l'avoine el l'orge Dans des expériences faites en serre, I'anhydride 1,8‐naphtalique (AN) employé pour l'enrobage des semences et le N,N‐dial‐lyl‐2,2‐dichloroacetamide (R 25788) egalement en enrobage oumélangé dans le réservoir du pulvérisateur avec I'herbicide, ont protégé le maïs ( Zea mays L.) des dommages résultant d'un traitement au barbane. Lorsqu'il a été appliqué après la levée du maïs, le R 25788 ne s'est pas montré efficace par voie foliaire: il doit atteindre le sol pour assurer une protection. Les traitements du sol en pluie abondante avec le R 25788 ont supprime efficacement les dégCts du barbane s'ils ont été effectues au plus 7 jours avant le traitement ou 1 jour au plus apres. Lorsque l'application a été faite 2 ou 3 jours apres le traitement au barbane, la protection n'a été que partielle. Ni l'AN ni le R 25788 n'ont complètement protégé I'orge ( Hordeum vulgare L.) ou I'avoine ( Avena sativa L.) d'un traitement ultériéur avec le barbane. Interaktionen zwischen Barban und Schutzstoffen (Antidote) bei Mais. Hafer und Gerste In Gewächshausversuchen wurde Mais ( Zea mays L.) vor einer Schädigung durch Barban geschützt, wenn 1,8‐Naphthylsäure‐anhydrid (NA) als Saatgutbeize und N,N‐Diallyl‐2,2‐dichlor‐acetamid (R 25788) entweder als Saatgutbeize oder als Tankmischung mit dem Herbizid angewendet wurden. Wenn R 25788 nach dem Auflaufen des Maises appliziert wurde, musste es um wirksam zu werden, auf den Boden gelangen; eine Wir‐kung über die Blätter konnte nicht festgestellt werden. Durch die Anwendung von R 25788 im Giessverfahren trat kein Barbanschaden auf, vorausgesetzt, dass die Anwendung bis zu 7 Tage vor oder bis zu einen Tag nach der Spritzung erfolgte. Wurde die Applikation erst 2 oder 3 Tage nach der Barbansprit‐zung durchgeführt, dann wurde nur ein teilweiser Schutz erzielt. Gerste ( Hordeum vulgare L.) und Hafer ( Avena saliva L.) wurden weder durch NA noch durch R 25788 völlig vor der schädigenden Wirkung einer darauffolgenden Barbanspritzung geschützt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
NA seed dressing protected maize from barban damage.
- Treatment
- 1,8‐naphthalic anhydride (NA) as a seed dressinge0
- Outcome
- barban damagee0
- Direction
- protectede0
- Setting
- glasshouse experimentse1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1,8‐naphthalic anhydride (NA) as a seed dressing, and N,N‐diallyl‐2,2‐dichloroacetamide (R25788), either as a seed dressing or mixed in the spray tank with the herbicide, protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
e1“In glasshouse experiments”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 seed dressing protected maize from barban damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,N‐diallyl‐2,2‐dichloroacetamide (R25788), either as a seed dressing or mixed in the spray tank with the herbicide, protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 spray-tank mixing protected maize from barban damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,N‐diallyl‐2,2‐dichloroacetamide (R25788), either as a seed dressing or mixed in the spray tank with the herbicide, protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence foliar R25788 was ineffective for maize protection.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When applied after maize emergence, R25788 was not effective through the foliage”
e1“reach the soil to provide protection”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence R25788 needed to reach soil to protect maize.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When applied after maize emergence, R25788 was not effective through the foliage but had to reach the soil to provide protection”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 soil drench protected maize when applied up to seven days before barban.
- Treatment
- Soil drench treatments of R25788e0
- Outcome
- barban damagee0
- Direction
- counterede0
- Qualifier
- up to 7 days prior to sprayinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil drench treatments of R25788 countered barban damage successfully if applied up to 7 days prior to spraying or up to one day after”
e1“protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 soil drench protected maize when applied up to one day after barban.
- Treatment
- Soil drench treatments of R25788e0
- Outcome
- barban damagee0
- Direction
- counterede0
- Qualifier
- up to one day aftere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil drench treatments of R25788 countered barban damage successfully if applied up to 7 days prior to spraying or up to one day after”
e1“protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 applied two or three days after barban gave only partial maize protection.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Delay of application to 2 or 3 days after barban resulted in only partial protection”
e1“protected maize (Zea mays L.) from subsequent barban damage”
Claim · model-written summary
NA did not completely protect barley against barban.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- NAe0
- Outcome
- barban spraye0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Neither NA nor R25788 completely protected barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) or oats ( Avena saliva L.) from a subsequent barban spray”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 did not completely protect barley against barban.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- R25788e0
- Outcome
- barban spraye0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither NA nor R25788 completely protected barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) or oats ( Avena saliva L.) from a subsequent barban spray”
Claim · model-written summary
NA did not completely protect oats against barban.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- NAe0
- Outcome
- barban spraye0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither NA nor R25788 completely protected barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) or oats ( Avena saliva L.) from a subsequent barban spray”
Claim · model-written summary
R25788 did not completely protect oats against barban.
- Taxon
- oatsAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- R25788e0
- Outcome
- barban spraye0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither NA nor R25788 completely protected barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) or oats ( Avena saliva L.) from a subsequent barban spray”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →application · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →herbicide · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.