Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Overall inoculation tended to improve white clover seedling establishment and early growth, although individual sites lacked statistical significance.

A claim from The effect ofRhizobiuminoculation on white clover in improved hill soils in the United Kingdom · 1982

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall inoculation tended to improve white clover seedling establishment and early growth, although individual sites lacked statistical significance.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
seedling establishment and the early growtlie0
Direction
enhancee0
Setting
all soil typese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite lack of statistical significance at individual sites the dominant overall trend was for inoculation to enhance seedling establishment and the early growtli of white clover in all soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1327
t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49

Title

The effect ofRhizobiuminoculation on white clover in improved hill soils in the United Kingdom

P. Newbould; A. J. Holding; G. J. Davies; et al. The Journal of Agricultural Science 1982. doi:10.1017/s0021859600031282

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e34e952752ebf343ddb3f0c07be706ef8f6d0dc050b245c1f02f2e3a1eb60a7c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.