Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High-cut non-BMR corn silage had less feeding-value improvement than BMR corn silage.

A claim from 创新:语文课应有的本色--《说特征,猜同学》教学实录及评点 · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cut non-BMR corn silage had less feeding-value improvement than BMR corn silage.

Material
non-BMRe0
Treatment
high harvest heighte0
Outcome
feeding valuee0
Direction
not equivalente0
Comparator
BMR corn silagee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting a silage-specific, non-BMR corn hybrid at a high harvest height improved its nutritive content, but the improvement in feeding value was not equivalent to that found when cows were fed BMR corn silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1825

Title

创新:语文课应有的本色--《说特征,猜同学》教学实录及评点

许晓凯; 雷实 语文建设 2003. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0236

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e358b552d4e2545da31261b14cd82e5bc024d20e5ed980b22cb00175a4d9a71d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 19 in the model’s answer

pruning · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.