Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Moisture deficiency and intensified UV-B radiation increased leaf photosynthetic pigment accumulation under ambient and elevated conditions.

A claim from Changing climate factors affects physiological indices of Pisum sativum L. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture deficiency and intensified UV-B radiation increased leaf photosynthetic pigment accumulation under ambient and elevated conditions.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
moisture deficiency and intensified UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls a, b and carotenoids) accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under ambient and elevated environmental conditions the moisture deficiency and intensified UV-B radiation significantly increased photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls a, b and carotenoids) accumulation in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–964
t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74

Title

Changing climate factors affects physiological indices of Pisum sativum L.

Sandra Sakalauskienė; Jurga Miliauskienė RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2019 2013. doi:10.15544/rd.2013.2.019

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e3aab5cb99bcc8df7ec31d2d7e5e5d46da2b80e7d3eedbc18c5c053488f1f2c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

21 papers: 3 positive, 18 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    UV-B radiation caused no loss of mesophyll light-saturated photosynthetic activity.

    Ultraviolet-B Radiation Effects on Water Relations, Leaf Development, and Photosynthesis in Droughted Pea Plants1 · 1998 · compared with grown without UV-B radiation

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Maximum Rubisco activity declined 38% after one day.

    Changes in mRNA levels and polypeptide subunits of ribulose 1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase in response to supplementary ultraviolet‐B radiation · 1992

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Growth reductions occurred without change in chlorophyll fluorescence or photosynthetic rate.

    Responses to ultraviolet‐B radiation (280–315 nm) of pea (Pisum sativum) lines differing in leaf surface wax · 1996

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    UV-B lowered CO2 assimilation.

    Evaluation of the role of damage to photosystem II in the inhibition of CO2 assimilation in pea leaves on exposure to UV‐B radiation · 1995

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    UV-B-treated pea leaves photosynthesized at 80% of the control rate.

    Alterations in photosynthesis and pigment distributions in pea leaves following UV‐B exposure · 1995 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    UV-B reduced variable-to-maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield ratios in rice and pea.

    Effects of Supplementary Ultraviolet-B Radiation on Rice and Pea Plants · 1993

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    UV-B did not significantly affect pea CO2 assimilation or light-saturated photosynthesis.

    A thirty percent increase in UV‐B has no impact on photosynthesis in well‐watered and droughted pea plants in the field · 1999

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    UV-B had no significant effect on chlorophyll fluorescence or leaf-area CO2 assimilation.

    Effects of enhanced UV‐B radiation on pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown under field conditions in the UK · 1996

    Opposite direction

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.