Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by 2,4-D lowered non-grassy weed density most effectively.

A claim from Efficacy of herbicides under different methods of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) establishments. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by 2,4-D lowered non-grassy weed density most effectively.

Treatment
pretilachlor fb 2,4–D (0.75 fb 0.5 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density of grassy and non-grassy weedse0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pretilachlor fb 2,4–D (0.75 fb 0.5 kg/ha) was most effective in lowering the weed density of grassy and non-grassy weeds and their dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–624
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68

Title

Efficacy of herbicides under different methods of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) establishments.

Mandhata Singh; R. P. Singh The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2010

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e3beebc9b13ecfe5c87a01f259ad08d8acdd33934cb07d6da456909ecd192d66 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.