Claim · model-written summary
ISFM users and non-users differed significantly in productivity for agroforestry, at the 1% level.
- Treatment
- agroforestrye0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Qualifier
- at the 1% levele0
- Comparator
- non-userse0
- Setting
- Benue State, Nigeriat0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Smallholder Maize Farmers in Benue State, Nigeria”
e0“Results on the effect of ISFM technology revealed a significant difference in productivity between users and non-users, particularly for inorganic fertilizer, legume intercropping, zero tillage, and agroforestry, all significant at the 1% level”
Title
Ishoribo J. T; Aondona James; Okeke A. M International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 2025. doi:10.55248/gengpi.6.0925.3235
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Cover cropping gave maize farmers the highest profit, 88,743.51/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage gave maize farmers the lowest profit, 73,166.14/100kg.
- Intervention effect ISFM users attained higher returns than non-users.
- Observation Manure gave the highest mean return, 90,393.77/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage gave the lowest mean return, 73,500/100kg.
- Observation Inorganic fertilizer incurred the highest expenses, 6,083.49/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage incurred the lowest expenses, 33.86/100kg.
- Intervention effect ISFM users and non-users differed significantly in productivity for inorganic fertilizer, legume intercropping and zero tillage, at the 1% level.
- Recommendation The authors recommend reducing implementation costs, improving resource access and providing tailored support for maize farmers.