Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend reducing implementation costs, improving resource access and providing tailored support for maize farmers.
- Outcome
- reducing implementation costs, improving access to resources, and providing tailored supporte1
- Setting
- Benue State, Nigeriat0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Smallholder Maize Farmers in Benue State, Nigeria”
e1“The study recommended reducing implementation costs, improving access to resources, and providing tailored support aligned with farmers' economic priorities”
Title
Ishoribo J. T; Aondona James; Okeke A. M International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 2025. doi:10.55248/gengpi.6.0925.3235
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Cover cropping gave maize farmers the highest profit, 88,743.51/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage gave maize farmers the lowest profit, 73,166.14/100kg.
- Intervention effect ISFM users attained higher returns than non-users.
- Observation Manure gave the highest mean return, 90,393.77/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage gave the lowest mean return, 73,500/100kg.
- Observation Inorganic fertilizer incurred the highest expenses, 6,083.49/100kg.
- Observation Zero or minimum tillage incurred the lowest expenses, 33.86/100kg.
- Intervention effect ISFM users and non-users differed significantly in productivity for inorganic fertilizer, legume intercropping and zero tillage, at the 1% level.
- Intervention effect ISFM users and non-users differed significantly in productivity for agroforestry, at the 1% level.