Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping maize and cassava in alternate rows (1C:1M) gave a land equivalent ratio (LER) advantage of 71%.

A claim from Achievements of Cassava Agronomy Research in Southern Ethiopia in the Last two Decades · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping maize and cassava in alternate rows (1C:1M) gave a land equivalent ratio (LER) advantage of 71%.

Treatment
intercropping maize and cassavae5
Outcome
LERe5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
71%e5
Qualifier
alternate rows (1C:1M)e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Results of intercropping maize and cassava showed that alternate rows (1C:1M) had LER advantage of 71%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–813

Title

Achievements of Cassava Agronomy Research in Southern Ethiopia in the Last two Decades

Daniel Markos; Legesse Hidoto; Fiseha Negash Agriculture and Food Sciences Research 2016. doi:10.20448/journal.512/2016.3.1/512.1.12.18

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e4356b37612f94d836fb7d4e72a377d27ea9a5d4c5b14bfef6a50d2f654f7597 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.