Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combination of liquid organic fertilizer at P1 and NPK at N3 gave the best effect on growth and production of peanut.

A claim from APPLICATION OF LIQUID ORGANIC FERTILIZER AND NPK Blue ON THE GROWTH OF PEANUT (Arachis hypogea L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of liquid organic fertilizer at P1 and NPK at N3 gave the best effect on growth and production of peanut.

Treatment
liquid organic fertilizer (P1) and dose of NPK fertilizer (N3)e4
Outcome
growth and production of peanut plantse4
Direction
best effecte4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“growth and development of peanut (arachis Hypogea L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–416
e4

“The interaction of treatment with liquid organic fertilizer (P1) and dose of NPK fertilizer (N3) gave the best effect on the growth and production of peanut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1386

Title

APPLICATION OF LIQUID ORGANIC FERTILIZER AND NPK Blue ON THE GROWTH OF PEANUT (Arachis hypogea L.)

Nico Syahputra Sebayang; Syariani Tambunan; Suhadi Suhadi BIOTIK Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan 2022. doi:10.22373/biotik.v10i1.10269

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e47b96abc7c4f7c5fda22515f0d179e6b5c4c1e837c3b577671656d7cd53d9a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Cover crop nitrogen fertilization did not influence peanut pod yield.

    Nitrogen Supply for Cover Crops and Effects on Peanut Grown in Succession under a No‐Till System · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing the added amount of FYM significantly decreased peanut shelling percentage, pod number and seeds per pod.

    Fog water harvesting providing stability for small Bedwe communities lives in North cost of Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Peanut yields were unchanged by N fertilization.

    Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess · 2023

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Fertilizer rate did not significantly influence number of pods per plant, pod yield or seed yield.

    Response of Two Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties to Sowing Date and NPK Fertilizer Rate in a Semi-Arid Environment: Yield and Yield Attributes · 2011

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Field nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield of nodulated genotypes.

    Growth, Nitrogen Uptake, and Partitioning in Nitrogen‐Fertilized Nodulating and Nonnodulating Peanut1 · 1985

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    On both soils, fruit drop-off was higher on plots fertilized in the same year peanuts were grown.

    Effect of Time and Rate of Fertilizer Application on Yield and Seed‐Size of Jumbo Runner Peanuts1 · 1962

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Peanut showed no yield response to fertilizer nitrogen over the 3-year study, indicating nitrogen sufficiency.

    Inoculation of Peanuts on Farmers' Fields in Alabama1 · 1983

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Sowing date combined with phosphorus fertilization had little impact on peanut pod yield, harvest index and shelling percent.

    Determination of appropriate sowing date and phosphorus fertilization strategy for peanut in Eastern India · 2014

    Opposite direction

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.