Intervention effectmodel-written summary

1% foliar spray application with 19:19:19 produced significantly higher grain of 25.53 q ha-1.

A claim from Effect of Fertilizer Levels and Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1% foliar spray application with 19:19:19 produced significantly higher grain of 25.53 q ha-1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
1% foliar spray application with 19:19:19e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.53e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From the treatments chosen for the investigation, 1% foliar spray application with 19:19:19 recorded significantly higher growth and yield contributing characters namely, plant height (59.46 cm), number of branches plant-1 (6.95), leaf area (10.63 dm2), dry matter plant-1 (26.07 g), number of pods plant-1 (68.25), number of seeds pod-1 (2.70), seed weight plant-1(35.37 g), grain and straw yield (25.53 and 33.51 q ha-1, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1271
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–79

Title

Effect of Fertilizer Levels and Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill)

T. Warpe Sarika; Jakku Prasanna; D. A. Sonawane; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1430987

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e47fa6373881883ac19463ac7cb9cdd37bf1358a84824f1c43149345608fd076 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.