Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield reduced by 12.67% in the 2nd year under the 2nd irrigation level compared with the 3rd level.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- 1st and 2nd irrigation levelse2
- Outcome
- Grain yielde2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 12.67%e2
- Qualifier
- under 1st and 2nd irrigation levels, respectivelye2
- Comparator
- 3rd levele2
- Setting
- 2nd yeare2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“BARLEY GENOTYPES”
e2“Grain yield reduced in the 1st year by an average of 25.67% and 13.44% and in the 2nd year by an average of 26.82% and 12.67% under 1st and 2nd irrigation levels, respectively, compared with the 3rd level”
Title
STABILITY ANALYSIS OF BARLEY GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT WATER STRESS LEVELS
Fatma Megahed; A. El-Khawaga; M. Ali; et al. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 2018. doi:10.21608/zjar.2018.48408
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Severe and moderate water stress significantly reduced all studied traits except 1000-grain weight in barley compared with adequate water supply.
- Intervention effect Grain yield reduced by 25.67% in the 1st year under the 1st irrigation level compared with the 3rd level.
- Intervention effect Grain yield reduced by 13.44% in the 1st year under the 2nd irrigation level compared with the 3rd level.
- Intervention effect Grain yield reduced by 26.82% in the 2nd year under the 1st irrigation level compared with the 3rd level.
- Observation Line 9, Rihane 3 and Line 11 were highly adapted to favorable environments for days to 50% heading.
- Observation Line 6, Line 5 and Giza 2000 were the stable genotypes for plant height.
- Observation Giza 126 was the stable genotype for flag leaf area.
- Observation Line 1, Line 11 and Rihane 3 were the stable genotypes for 1000-grain weight.
- Observation Line 9, Line 7 and Line 2 were the stable genotypes for biological yield.
- Observation Line 6, Line 9 and line 10 were the stable genotypes for grain yield.
- Observation Line 11 and Giza 2000 were highly adapted to favorable environments for days to 50% heading (genotypic stability).
- Observation Line 2 was the stable genotype for plant height, 1000-grain weight and biological yield.
- Observation California mariout, Giza 123, Line 4, Line 6 and Line 7 were the stable genotypes for grain yield (genotypic stability).
- Observation Line 1, Giza 123, California mariout, Line 8 and Line 6 were the most desired and stable genotypes for grain yield (AMMI stability value and GGE biplot).
- Observation Line 9 was the ideal genotype for days to 50% heading and biological yield (GGE biplot).
- Observation Line 6 was the ideal genotype for plant height and grain yield (GGE biplot).
- Observation Line 11 was the ideal genotype for flag leaf area (GGE biplot).
- Observation Line 1 was the ideal genotype for 1000-grain weight (GGE biplot).