Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined bio-organic phosphate and bacteria improved growth and yield parameters.

A claim from Combined application of bio-organic phosphate and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus strain MWT 14) improve the performance of bread wheat with low fertilizer input under an arid climate · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-organic phosphate and bacteria improved growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined application of bio-organic phosphate and the phosphorous solubilizing bacteria straine0
Interactor
phosphorous solubilizing bacteria straine0symbiont
Outcome
growth, yield parameters and productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of bio-organic phosphate and the phosphorous solubilizing bacteria strain at either fertilizer level significantly improved the growth, yield parameters and productivity of both wheat cultivars compared to non-inoculated control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–282
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–146

Title

Combined application of bio-organic phosphate and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus strain MWT 14) improve the performance of bread wheat with low fertilizer input under an arid climate

Muhammad Tahir; Umaira Khalid; Muhammad Ijaz; et al. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2018. doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2017.11.005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e4a0bf05eef656cc59da91029050c360f4a7f1545650a4fbc1cee7fdc5969c55 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    RP plus B. velezensis increased Spike length by 19%.

    Rock Phosphate Solubilization by Plant Growth-Promoting Bacillus velezensis and Its Impact on Wheat Growth and Yield · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Purulia rock phosphate with oxalic-acid composite and bacterial inoculation produced significantly better wheat yield than other treatments.

    Solubilization of Purulia Rock Phosphate Through Organic Acid Loaded Nanoclay Polymer Composite and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and its Effectiveness as P-fertilizer to Wheat · 2015 · compared with other treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    BOP increased grain yield to 4.5 g per plant compared with the uninoculated 80 and 100% controls.

    Development of bacteria-based bioorganic phosphate fertilizer enriched with rock phosphate for sustainable wheat production · 2024 · compared with uninoculated 80 and 100% controls

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. negative
    Low phosphorus stress reduced tiller number in Kenong 199 wheat.

    Transcriptome analysis of axillary buds in low phosphorus stress and functional analysis of TaWRKY74s in wheat · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    RAC875 had higher grain yield than Wyalkatchem at maturity under low phosphorus.

    Variation in root system architecture and morphology of two wheat genotypes is a predictor of their tolerance to phosphorus deficiency · 2019

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  6. no effect
    Neither nitrogen nor phosphorus produced a significant grain yield response.

    Water use, growth and yield of wheat in a subtropical environment · 1980

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.

    The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979

    Opposite direction

563 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Pot inoculation with Azospirillum increased wheat grain yield by 9.3% over uninoculated control.

    Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizer Azospirillum, Bacillus and Enterobacter strains by 16SrRNA sequence analysis and their effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2013 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Bacillus sp. MWT-14 with fertilizer increased 1000-grain weight by 9.8%, 5.4%, 4.6% at Multan over non-inoculated controls.

    BACTERIA IN COMBINATION WITH FERTILIZERS IMPROVE GROWTH, PRODUCTIVITY AND NET RETURNS OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2016 · compared with non-inoculated control treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Pantoea inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 10–12% in field trials.

    Inoculation of pqq E gene inhabiting Pantoea and Pseudomonas strains improves the growth and grain yield of wheat with a reduced amount of chemical fertilizer · 2020 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. positive
    Purulia rock phosphate with oxalic-acid composite and bacterial inoculation produced significantly better wheat yield than other treatments.

    Solubilization of Purulia Rock Phosphate Through Organic Acid Loaded Nanoclay Polymer Composite and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and its Effectiveness as P-fertilizer to Wheat · 2015 · compared with other treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    Fusarium inoculation significantly lowered winter wheat yield by 24.2-45.0% relative to uninoculated check plots.

    Effects of Field Application of Tebuconazole on Yield, Yield Components and the Mycotoxin Content of Fusarium-infected Wheat Grain · 2000 · compared with Check plots

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced wheat yield.

    Fusarium ear blight of wheat: the use of quantitative PCR and visual disease assessment in studies of disease control · 1999

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Biofertilizer as a soil mix reduced wheat growth and yield versus conventional N.

    Chemical and Biological Enhancement Effects of Biochar on Wheat Growth and Yield under Arid Field Conditions · 2021 · compared with control (conventional N fertilization)

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation had negligible effect on grain yield and nitrogen uptake.

    Effects of Field Inoculation with VAM and Bacteria Consortia on Root Growth and Nutrients Uptake in Common Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.