Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Development of bacteria-based bioorganic phosphate fertilizer enriched with rock phosphate for sustainable wheat production

Zoya Aslam; Mahreen Yahya; Hafiz Shahid Hussain; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorous (P) is a limiting macronutrient for crop growth. Its deficiency prevents plant development leading to an extensive use of phosphatic fertilizers globally. Bio-organic phosphate (BOP) fertilizer provides a sustainable approach to optimize nutrient availability, enhance crop yield, and mitigate the negative impacts of chemical fertilizers on the environment. Therefore, the present study integrates the application of heat-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, rock phosphate, and organic materials for the development of BOP. For this purpose, potential heat-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) were isolated from major wheat-growing areas of southern Punjab. Five isolates were the efficient phosphate solubilizers based on in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activity (291–454 μg ml −1 and 278–421 μg ml −1 ) with a concomitant decrease in pH (up to 4.5) at 45°C and 50°C, respectively. These PSB were used for the development of potential consortia that are compatible and showed high P solubilization. In planta evaluation of these PSB consortia in a pot experiment under net house conditions showed that consortium-2 had a favorable impact on growth parameter with enhanced grain yield (9.63 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10 μg g −1 ) as compared with 80% uninoculated control. The microcosm study was conducted to evaluate PSB consortium-2 integrated with carrier material (plant material and filter mud) and rock phosphate as BOP increased total phosphorous (14%) as compared with uninoculated controls. Plant-based BOP showed higher viable count (3.5 × 10 8 \u00B0CFU) as compared with filter mud-based BOP. Furthermore, the effect of BOP on wheat growth parameters revealed that BOP showed a promising influence on grain yield (4.5 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10.7 μg g −1 ) as compared with uninoculated 80 and 100% controls. Principle component analysis (PCA) further validates a positive correlation between BOP with grain weight and plant height and soil available P as compared with both 80 and 100% controls. For the first time, this study reports the combined application of bio-organic phosphate fertilizer and heat-tolerant PSB, which offers an eco-friendly option to harvest better wheat yield with low fertilizer input.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates solubilized phosphate at 291–454 μg ml −1 at 45°C in vitro.

Interactor
phosphate solubilizerse1symbiont
Outcome
in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activitye1
Value
291–454 μg ml −1e1
Qualifier
at 45°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five isolates were the efficient phosphate solubilizers based on in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activity (291–454 μg ml −1 and 278–421 μg ml −1 ) with a concomitant decrease in pH (up to 4.5) at 45°C and 50°C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates solubilized phosphate at 278–421 μg ml −1 at 50°C in vitro.

Interactor
phosphate solubilizerse1symbiont
Outcome
in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activitye1
Value
278–421 μg ml −1e1
Qualifier
at 45°C and 50°C, respectivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five isolates were the efficient phosphate solubilizers based on in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activity (291–454 μg ml −1 and 278–421 μg ml −1 ) with a concomitant decrease in pH (up to 4.5) at 45°C and 50°C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolates decreased medium pH by up to 4.5 at 45°C and 50°C.

Interactor
phosphate solubilizerse1symbiont
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
up to 4.5e1
Qualifier
at 45°C and 50°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Five isolates were the efficient phosphate solubilizers based on in vitro phosphate-solubilizing activity (291–454 μg ml −1 and 278–421 μg ml −1 ) with a concomitant decrease in pH (up to 4.5) at 45°C and 50°C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium-2 enhanced grain yield to 9.63 g per plant compared with the 80% uninoculated control.

Treatment
consortium-2e3
Interactor
consortium-2e3symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
9.63 g plant −1e3
Comparator
80% uninoculated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“consortium-2 had a favorable impact on growth parameter with enhanced grain yield (9.63 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10 μg g −1 ) as compared with 80% uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium-2 enhanced soil available P to 10 μg per gram compared with the 80% uninoculated control.

Treatment
consortium-2e3
Interactor
consortium-2e3symbiont
Outcome
soil available Pe3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
10 μg g −1e3
Comparator
80% uninoculated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“consortium-2 had a favorable impact on growth parameter with enhanced grain yield (9.63 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10 μg g −1 ) as compared with 80% uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOP increased grain yield to 4.5 g per plant compared with the uninoculated 80 and 100% controls.

Treatment
BOPe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
4.5 g plant −1e2
Comparator
uninoculated 80 and 100% controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the effect of BOP on wheat growth parameters revealed that BOP showed a promising influence on grain yield (4.5 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10.7 μg g −1 ) as compared with uninoculated 80 and 100% controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOP increased soil available P to 10.7 μg per gram compared with the uninoculated 80 and 100% controls.

Treatment
BOPe2
Outcome
soil available Pe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
10.7 μg g −1e2
Comparator
uninoculated 80 and 100% controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the effect of BOP on wheat growth parameters revealed that BOP showed a promising influence on grain yield (4.5 g plant −1 ) and soil available P (10.7 μg g −1 ) as compared with uninoculated 80 and 100% controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB consortium-2 with carrier material and rock phosphate as BOP increased total phosphorus by 14% in the microcosm compared with uninoculated controls.

Treatment
PSB consortium-2 integrated with carrier material (plant material and filter mud) and rock phosphate as BOPe4
Interactor
PSBe4symbiont
Outcome
total phosphorouse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
14%e4
Comparator
uninoculated controlse4
Setting
microcosme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The microcosm study was conducted to evaluate PSB consortium-2 integrated with carrier material (plant material and filter mud) and rock phosphate as BOP increased total phosphorous (14%) as compared with uninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-based BOP had a higher viable count of bacteria than filter mud-based BOP.

Treatment
Plant-based BOPe5
Outcome
viable counte5
Direction
highere5
Value
3.5 × 10 8e5
Comparator
filter mud-based BOPe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant-based BOP showed higher viable count (3.5 × 10 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1594 · show in text ↑
e6

“as compared with filter mud-based BOP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1643 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOP correlated positively with grain weight, plant height and soil available P compared with both 80 and 100% controls.

Treatment
BOPe7
Outcome
grain weight and plant height and soil available Pe7
Direction
positivee7
Comparator
both 80 and 100% controlse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
e7

“Principle component analysis (PCA) further validates a positive correlation between BOP with grain weight and plant height and soil available P as compared with both 80 and 100% controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–2058 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of bio-organic phosphate fertilizer and heat-tolerant PSB offers an option for better wheat yield with low fertilizer input.

Treatment
combined application of bio-organic phosphate fertilizer and heat-tolerant PSBe0
Outcome
better wheat yield with low fertilizer inpute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the first time, this study reports the combined application of bio-organic phosphate fertilizer and heat-tolerant PSB, which offers an eco-friendly option to harvest better wheat yield with low fertilizer input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2060–2274 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.