Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mulching increased fresh and dry forage yields for pearl millet.

A claim from PERFORMANCE OF SORGHUM AND PEARL MILLET FORAGE CROPS PRODUCTIVITY BY USING DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENTS UNDER SALINITY CONDITIONS · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased fresh and dry forage yields for pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
soil mulching with casuarina defoliated leavese0
Outcome
fresh and dry forage yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without soil mulchinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil mulching with casuarina defoliated leaves significantly increased soil moisture content as well as plant height, number of tillers/m2, fresh and dry forage yields of sorghum and pearl millet forage crops as compared with without soil mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1447

Title

PERFORMANCE OF SORGHUM AND PEARL MILLET FORAGE CROPS PRODUCTIVITY BY USING DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENTS UNDER SALINITY CONDITIONS

Kh. Hassan; M. Abd El-Maaboud; M. Draz; et al. Journal of Plant Production 2016. doi:10.21608/jpp.2016.45348

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e4d83c5cc8ad8ed5139e66d1e921456aec6f4a6401a88aa3e150a587bbdc3103 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

pruning · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.