Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Trichoderma conidial inoculation promoted rice seedling growth.

A claim from Plant Growth Promotion and Biological Control against Rhizoctonia solani in Thai Local Rice Variety “Chor Khing” Using Trichoderma breve Z2-03 · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma conidial inoculation promoted rice seedling growth.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee1
Treatment
inoculation with Trichoderma conidiae0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Trichoderma conidia promoted rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1325
e1

“during the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1400

Title

Plant Growth Promotion and Biological Control against Rhizoctonia solani in Thai Local Rice Variety “Chor Khing” Using Trichoderma breve Z2-03

Warin Intana; Nakarin Suwannarach; Jaturong Kumla; et al. Journal of Fungi 2024. doi:10.3390/jof10060417

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e4dd6df9e83c61dd260b6aba62e211ea1699adb928f3e305d2cfd031c8b4f542 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Trichoderma · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 362 positive, 37 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

390 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.