Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization levels did not significantly differ for sorghum ratoon-1.

A claim from Yield performance of Sorghum Ratoon-1 as affected by different dosages of N fertilization · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization levels did not significantly differ for sorghum ratoon-1.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
different levels of N fertilizatione0
Outcome
sorghum ratoon-1e0
Direction
did not show significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different levels of N fertilization did not show significant differences in sorghum ratoon-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1464

Title

Yield performance of Sorghum Ratoon-1 as affected by different dosages of N fertilization

Muhammad Kamal; M. S. Hadi; K. Setiawan; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1208/1/012032

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e4fa66c2a01c2c207471b71d52e5d1370df6960a12e0b52b5706c9bfdb46cd95 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Sorghum fodder yield was highest with 50% RDF plus 50% RDN through FYM.

    Productivity, profitability and land-use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max)-based cropping systems under different nutrient-management practices · 2001

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Ash treatments improved sorghum health.

    Increasing Fertilization Efficiency of Biomass Ash by the Synergistically Acting Digestate and Extract from Water Plants Sequestering CO2 in Sorghum Crops · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Integrative fertilizer with sole weed-free sorghum gave the highest sorghum dry matter.

    Effects of types of nitrogenous fertilizer (biological, chemical, integrative) and cropping mixes on some forage-medicine characteristics in additive intercropping of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor[L.] Moench) with fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecumL.) · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Foliar chelated micronutrients increased green mass yield by 27.1-39.9 t/ha.

    The application of chelated forms of micronutrient fertilizers in sorghum cultivation · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    NPK microdosing progressively improved tested Sorghum traits.

    Microdosing technology of fertilizer for sorghum production at Shambat, Sudan · 2017 · compared with control without fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Integrated nutrient management raised sorghum seed yield to 2531 kg/ha versus organic or inorganic fertilizer alone.

    Studies on the effect of in-situ soil moisture conservation and nutrient management practices on the productivity of sesame and sorghum in sequence cropping system. · 2010 · compared with organic manures alone

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Nitrogen fertilizer and biohumate fertigation increased sweet sorghum grain yield.

    Sweet Sorghum Raw Material Production on Reclaimed Lands · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Chemical fertilizer yielded 330.2 kg/667m 2, 97.96% above unfertilized control.

    Effects of Organic Fertilizer from Moutai Distillers' Gains and Its Application Method for Sorghum · 2006 · compared with CK

    Opposite direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.