Paper · 2021 · Agrology

Sweet Sorghum Raw Material Production on Reclaimed Lands

M. M. Kharytonov; M. G. Babenko; V. I. Kozechko; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bioenergetic characteristics of quantitative and qualitative properties of sweet sorghumhybrids are provided on the basis of a comprehensive study under conditions of cultivationon reclaimed lands. The results of studying the growth and yield characteristics of hybrids ofdomestic and American selection during four years from 2016 to 2019 under the conditions of thePokrov educational and scientific station of land reclamation DSAEU are presented. The height ofthe crop stands varied from 235.3 to 300.0 cm when growing sweet sorghum on various substratesof mining formations. The lowest yield of green biomass was observed mainly on gray-green clay(38.1 t/ha), and the highest – on loess-like loam (101.0 t/ha). Fertililizing with nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigation helped to strengthen vertical growth, increase the yield of greenbiomass and sweet sorghum grains. The greatest effect was obtained for American hybrids. ForUkrainian hybrids, the application of nitrogen fertilizers had a positive effect on black soil andloess-like loam while the effect of biohumate was noticed only on loess-like loam. Long-termresearch of the sweet sorghum hybrids allowed us to evaluate the studied objects by the level ofpossible production of green biomass and theoretical bioethanol. Ukrainian hybrids Medove andZubr using allow to produce on marginal lands from 3600 to 4250 l/ha of ethanol. The potential ofAmerican hybrids SS506 and Mohawk is slightly lower – 3150–3400 l/ha. Fertigation with nitrogenfertilizer increases the yield of theoretical ethanol from 27% to 68%, irrigation and additionof biohumate – from 15% to 36%

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet sorghum crop stand height ranged from 235.3 to 300.0 cm on mining substrates.

Taxon
sweet sorghume0
Outcome
height ofthe crop standse0
Value
235.3 to 300.0 cme0
Setting
various substratesof mining formationse0

Verbatim

e0

“The height ofthe crop stands varied from 235.3 to 300.0 cm when growing sweet sorghum on various substratesof mining formations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green biomass yield was lowest on gray-green clay at 38.1 t/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
yield of green biomasse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
38.1 t/hae0
Setting
gray-green claye0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield of green biomass was observed mainly on gray-green clay(38.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green biomass yield was highest on loess-like loam at 101.0 t/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
yield of green biomasse1
Direction
higheste0
Value
101.0 t/hae0
Setting
loess-like loame0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest – on loess-like loam (101.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest yield of green biomass was observed mainly on gray-green clay(38.1 t/ha), and the highest – on loess-like loam (101.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer and biohumate fertigation strengthened vertical growth.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigatione0
Outcome
vertical growthe0
Direction
strengthene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertililizing with nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigation helped to strengthen vertical growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer and biohumate fertigation increased green biomass yield.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigatione0
Outcome
yield of greenbiomasse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertililizing with nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigation helped to strengthen vertical growth, increase the yield of greenbiomass and sweet sorghum grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer and biohumate fertigation increased sweet sorghum grain yield.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigatione0
Outcome
sweet sorghum grainse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertililizing with nitrogen fertilizerand biohumate by fertigation helped to strengthen vertical growth, increase the yield of greenbiomass and sweet sorghum grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest fertilizer and biohumate effect was for American hybrids.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
American hybridse0
Outcome
greatest effecte0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest effect was obtained for American hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer benefited Ukrainian hybrids on black soil and loess-like loam.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
Ukrainian hybridse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
positive effecte0
Direction
positivee0
Setting
black soil andloess-like loame0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ForUkrainian hybrids, the application of nitrogen fertilizers had a positive effect on black soil andloess-like loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biohumate benefited Ukrainian hybrids only on loess-like loam.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
Ukrainian hybridse1
Treatment
biohumatee0
Outcome
effect of biohumatee0
Setting
loess-like loame0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of biohumate was noticed only on loess-like loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“ForUkrainian hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Medove and Zubr had theoretical ethanol potential of 3600 to 4250 l/ha on marginal lands.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
Medove andZubre0
Outcome
ethanole0
Value
3600 to 4250 l/hae0
Setting
marginal landse0

Verbatim

e0

“Ukrainian hybrids Medove andZubr using allow to produce on marginal lands from 3600 to 4250 l/ha of ethanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

SS506 and Mohawk had slightly lower theoretical ethanol potential of 3150–3400 l/ha.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
SS506 and Mohawke0
Outcome
theoretical bioethanole1
Direction
slightly lowere0
Value
3150–3400 l/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The potential ofAmerican hybrids SS506 and Mohawk is slightly lower – 3150–3400 l/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“theoretical bioethanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer fertigation increased theoretical ethanol yield by 27% to 68%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
Fertigation with nitrogenfertilizere0
Outcome
yield of theoretical ethanole0
Direction
increasese0
Value
27% to 68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertigation with nitrogenfertilizer increases the yield of theoretical ethanol from 27% to 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and biohumate increased theoretical ethanol yield by 15% to 36%.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
irrigation and additionof biohumatee0
Outcome
yield of theoretical ethanole1
Direction
increasese1
Value
15% to 36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation and additionof biohumate – from 15% to 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1634 · show in text ↑
e1

“increases the yield of theoretical ethanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · organism · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.