Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sakha 94 grain yield was reduced by 72.21% and 69.55% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.

A claim from EVALUATION OF WATER SALINITY ON SOME SOIL PROPERTIES AND SALT TOLERANCE OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 94 grain yield was reduced by 72.21% and 69.55% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.

Taxon
wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
Material
Sakha 94e0
Treatment
increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfme5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
reductione5
Value
72.21 and 69.55%e5
Qualifier
in the first and second seasonse5
Comparator
0.4e5

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–322
e1

“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–229
e5

“The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1310

Title

EVALUATION OF WATER SALINITY ON SOME SOIL PROPERTIES AND SALT TOLERANCE OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS

Asmaa El-Basyouny; Nl. Taiha; Hamida El-Sanafawy Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2006. doi:10.21608/jssae.2006.225060

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e521233f7c074639ab8577d5052d64e9d916387b994aa0f85d361840ea0e54c0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.