Abstract
Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars. The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4). The levels of sailnity of the irrigation water were; 0.4 (control treatment), 4.0, 8.0, 12.0 and 16.00 dS/m; S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5 respectively at sodium absorption ratio about 7 (SAR 7). The observed results can be summarized as follows: 1- The results revealed that the increase in ECe value of studied soil samples were 10.46, 16.26, 22.93 and 24.65 dS/m which resulted from using irrigation water having EC of 4.0, 8.5, 12.5, and 161d6m, respectively compared with control EC. value of 5.2 dS/m. Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and ESP were increased as a result of Na accumulation in the used soils. 2. Grain and, straw yields, total dry matter, 100 grain weight and harvest index were significantly decreased with increasing EC. The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons. 3. The study showed that the cultivars differed in their tolerance to water salinity levels. Sakha 94 wheat cultÑar was tolerate upto EC8.0 dS/m. While Sakha 93, Gemmeiza (10) and Sakha 8 were tolerate up to 4.0 dSIm. 4. The chemical composition of wheat cultivars was affected by water salinity levels. The control treatment obtained the highest values of N,P, and Kuptake by grain and straw yields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Soil ECe increased to 10.46 to 24.65 dS/m with increasing irrigation water salinity, compared with a control EC of 5.2 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivars
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- irrigation water salinitye1
- Outcome
- ECe value of studied soil samplese2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 10.46, 16.26, 22.93 and 24.65 dS/me2
- Comparator
- control ECe3
- Setting
- wire proof-green house conditionse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e2“The results revealed that the increase in ECe value of studied soil samples were 10.46, 16.26, 22.93 and 24.65 dS/m”
e3“compared with control EC. value of 5.2 dS/m”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain and straw yields and total dry matter were significantly decreased with increasing water salinity.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- increasing ECe4
- Outcome
- Grain and, straw yields, total dry mattere4
- Direction
- decreasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e4“Grain and, straw yields, total dry matter, 100 grain weight and harvest index were significantly decreased with increasing EC”
Claim · model-written summary
100-grain weight and harvest index were significantly decreased with increasing water salinity.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- increasing ECe4
- Outcome
- 100 grain weight and harvest indexe4
- Direction
- decreasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e4“Grain and, straw yields, total dry matter, 100 grain weight and harvest index were significantly decreased with increasing EC”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha 93 grain yield was reduced by 71.05% and 63.66% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Sakha 93e0
- Treatment
- increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfme5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- reductione5
- Value
- 71.05 and 63.66%e5
- Qualifier
- in the first and second seasonse5
- Comparator
- 0.4e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e5“The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha 94 grain yield was reduced by 72.21% and 69.55% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Sakha 94e0
- Treatment
- increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfme5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- reductione5
- Value
- 72.21 and 69.55%e5
- Qualifier
- in the first and second seasonse5
- Comparator
- 0.4e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e5“The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Gemmiza 10 grain yield was reduced by 66.55% and 73.9% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Gemmiza 10e0
- Treatment
- increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfme5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- reductione5
- Value
- 66.55 and 73.9%e5
- Qualifier
- in the first and second seasonse5
- Comparator
- 0.4e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e5“The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha8 grain yield was reduced by 70.63% and 77.85% in the first and second seasons under salinity increase from 0.4 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Sakha8e0
- Treatment
- increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfme5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- reductione5
- Value
- 70.63 and 77.85%e5
- Qualifier
- in the first and second seasonse5
- Comparator
- 0.4e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e5“The observed reduction in grain yield caused by increasing water salinity from 0.4 to 16.0 dSfm were (71.05 and 63.66%), (72.21 and 69.55%), (66.55 and 73.9%) and (70.63 and 77.85%) for CV., CV2, CV3 and CV4, respectively in the first and second seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha 94 tolerated irrigation water salinity up to EC 8.0 dS/m.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Sakha 94e0
- Outcome
- toleratee6
- Value
- EC8.0 dS/me6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wheat cultivars were; Sakha 93 (CV1), Sakha 94 (CV2), Gemmiza 10 (CV3) and Sakha8 (CV4)”
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e6“was tolerate upto EC8.0 dS/m”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha 93, Gemmeiza 10 and Sakha 8 tolerated irrigation water salinity up to 4.0.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Sakha 93, Gemmeiza (10) and Sakha 8e7
- Outcome
- toleratee7
- Value
- 4.0e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e7“Sakha 93, Gemmeiza (10) and Sakha 8 were tolerate up to 4.0”
Claim · model-written summary
Control irrigation gave the highest N,P and K uptake by grain and straw.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Organ / stage
- grain and strawe2
- Treatment
- water salinity levelse3
- Outcome
- N,P, and Ke2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e2“The control treatment obtained the highest values of N,P, and Kuptake by grain and straw yields”
e3“The chemical composition of wheat cultivars was affected by water salinity levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Sodium adsorption ratio and ESP increased as a result of Na accumulation in the used soils.
- Taxon
- wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Na accumulatione2
- Outcome
- Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and ESPe2
- Direction
- increasede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two pot experiments were conducted under wire proof-green house conditions to study the influence of irrigation water salinity on the state of soil salinity yield, yield components and chemical composition of four wheat cultivars”
e2“Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and ESP were increased as a result of Na accumulation in the used soils”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.