Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 20 kg/hm2 sulphur, grain yield rose 10.69% in one cultivar relative to no sulphur.

A claim from Effects of Sulphur Application on Carbon and Nitrogen Assimilate Translocation and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat Cultivars with Different Gluten · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 kg/hm2 sulphur, grain yield rose 10.69% in one cultivar relative to no sulphur.

Treatment
20 kg/hm2 sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.69%e0
Comparator
no sulphur fertilizer application treatment(S1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with no sulphur fertilizer application treatment(S1),the yield components with the treatment of 20 kg/hm2 sulphur application of both cultivars were obviously increased,and grain yield was significantly increased by 10.69% and 9.78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–868
t0

“Winter Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–120

Title

Effects of Sulphur Application on Carbon and Nitrogen Assimilate Translocation and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat Cultivars with Different Gluten

Zhu Xiao-jie Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2007

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e52fc2a9713b20d22a78daa2474c9b8b203de19fcd41a922d2ecb8850aa30a8f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.