Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At two sites corn grain yield at low density did not differ from standard density.

A claim from Corn Density Effect on Interseeded Cover Crops, Weeds, and Grain Yield · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two sites corn grain yield at low density did not differ from standard density.

Treatment
low corn density (3.71 plants m −2 )e0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
At two sitese0
Comparator
standard densitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At two sites, corn grain yield at the low corn density (3.71 plants m −2 ) did not differ from corn grain yield at the standard density (7.41 plants m −2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1071

Title

Corn Density Effect on Interseeded Cover Crops, Weeds, and Grain Yield

Connor Z. Youngerman; Antonio DiTommaso; William S. Curran; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e5488c997f41b6c768e82b3fdb612edef4c56577653ea9047b8db34843d54f08 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this claim · 196 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
    corn yield increased up to 30% versus monoculture.

    Corn–Soybean Rotation Effects on Soil Water Depletion · 1993 · compared with monoculture

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.