Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Corn–Soybean Rotation Effects on Soil Water Depletion

P. J. Copeland; R. R. Allmaras; R. K. Crookston; et al.

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The positive yield effect of crop rotation may be linked to enhanced water uptake and associated efficient use. We hypothesized that a crop grown in rotation might deplete soil water more than the same crop grown under monoculture because some negative factor associated with monoculture was alleviated. Water use efficiency (WUE) might also be improved by rotation. The objective of our study was to determine whether altered water uptake or altered WUE was associated with the yield increase observed when corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] are rotated. A long‐term corn‐soybean rotation experiment was monitored in 1987 and 1988 to determine seasonal soil water status to 1.50m. Corn and soybean sequences monitored were: monoculture, first‐year crop following 5 yrs of the other crop, second‐year crop following 5 yrs of the other crop, and an annual alteration of the two crops. Compared with monoculture, yield was increased up to 30% when corn followed soybean and up to 11% when soybean followed corn. Average soil water depletion during the season by first‐year corn was 16 mm greater than by continuous corn. The WUE in corn was related to cropping sequence at a moderate level of significance ( p = 0.14). Seasonal soil water depletion by soybean was not changed by cropping sequence but overall WUE by first‐year soybean was higher than by continuous soybean ( p = 0.05). When there was a period with only sparse rainfall in 1988, corn had a greater water depletion than soybean and also a deeper zone of depletion. Both crops exhibited a greater water depletion when rotated. Frequent rainfall in 1987 sufficient to wet the soil below 0.30 m obliterated patterns of depleted soil water. Increased water use observed in first‐year corn and increased WUE observed in first‐year soybean (compared to monoculture) in both years suggest that rotation allows these crops to increase root surface or root activity and hence to improve grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

corn yield increased up to 30% versus monoculture.

Treatment
corn followed soybeane0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with monoculture, yield was increased up to 30% when corn followed soybean and up to 11% when soybean followed corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

soybean yield increased up to 11% versus monoculture.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soybean followed corne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with monoculture, yield was increased up to 30% when corn followed soybean and up to 11% when soybean followed corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year corn depleted 16 mm more soil water than continuous corn.

Treatment
first‐year corne0
Outcome
soil water depletione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
16 mme0
Comparator
continuous corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average soil water depletion during the season by first‐year corn was 16 mm greater than by continuous corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1150 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn water use efficiency was related to cropping sequence with p = 0.14.

Treatment
cropping sequencee0
Outcome
WUEe0
Value
p = 0.14e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE in corn was related to cropping sequence at a moderate level of significance ( p = 0.14).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping sequence did not change seasonal soybean soil water depletion.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
cropping sequencee0
Outcome
Seasonal soil water depletione0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal soil water depletion by soybean was not changed by cropping sequence but overall WUE by first‐year soybean was higher than by continuous soybean ( p = 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year soybean had higher WUE than continuous soybean (p = 0.05).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
first‐year soybeane0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
p = 0.05e0
Comparator
continuous soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal soil water depletion by soybean was not changed by cropping sequence but overall WUE by first‐year soybean was higher than by continuous soybean ( p = 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During sparse rainfall in 1988, corn depleted more water than soybean.

Outcome
water depletione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
sparse rainfall in 1988e0
Comparator
soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When there was a period with only sparse rainfall in 1988, corn had a greater water depletion than soybean and also a deeper zone of depletion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During sparse rainfall in 1988, corn had a deeper depletion zone than soybean.

Outcome
zone of depletione0
Direction
deepere0
Qualifier
sparse rainfall in 1988e0
Comparator
soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When there was a period with only sparse rainfall in 1988, corn had a greater water depletion than soybean and also a deeper zone of depletion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

corn showed greater water depletion under rotation.

Treatment
rotatede0
Outcome
water depletione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops exhibited a greater water depletion when rotated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn–Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

soybean showed greater water depletion under rotation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
rotatede0
Outcome
water depletione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops exhibited a greater water depletion when rotated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn–Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent 1987 rainfall erased soil water depletion patterns.

Outcome
patterns of depleted soil watere0
Direction
obliteratede0
Qualifier
Frequent rainfall in 1987e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frequent rainfall in 1987 sufficient to wet the soil below 0.30 m obliterated patterns of depleted soil water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn–Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that rotation may increase corn root surface or activity and improve grain yield.

Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
increase root surface or root activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased water use observed in first‐year corn and increased WUE observed in first‐year soybean (compared to monoculture) in both years suggest that rotation allows these crops to increase root surface or root activity and hence to improve grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1985 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that rotation may increase soybean root surface or activity and improve grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
increase root surface or root activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased water use observed in first‐year corn and increased WUE observed in first‐year soybean (compared to monoculture) in both years suggest that rotation allows these crops to increase root surface or root activity and hence to improve grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1985 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.