Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Photosynthetic performance, particularly at 16 weeks, was enhanced in ectomycorrhizal-inoculated plants.

A claim from Saprotrophic-ectomycorrhizal fungal interactions affect poplar performance · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic performance, particularly at 16 weeks, was enhanced in ectomycorrhizal-inoculated plants.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Ectomycorrhizal-inoculatede0
Outcome
Photosynthetic performancee1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
16 weekse1
Comparator
non-inoculated controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ectomycorrhizal-inoculated plants showed greater growth, root development, and nitrogen accumulation than non-inoculated controls or those inoculated with saprotrophic fungi alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1186
e1

“Photosynthetic performance, particularly at 16 weeks, was also enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1259
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62

Title

Saprotrophic-ectomycorrhizal fungal interactions affect poplar performance

Rodica Pena; Gemma Milner; Mark Tibbett Environmental and Experimental Botany 2025. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106246

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e565e44ce97ff4df9d515d1ddc15171a4fe02e5e47bab05a9f7457ba1085107f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Populus (poplar)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.