Claim · model-written summary
Continuous lighting applied in the pre-reproductive period delayed flowering in tomato compared with control plants.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- pre-reproductive periode4
- Treatment
- continuous lighting (CL)e4
- Outcome
- floweringe4
- Direction
- delayede4
- Comparator
- Control plantse5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato plants”
e4“the unfavorable influence of continuous lighting (CL) applied during the pre-reproductive period was evident in the delayed flowering, reduced fruit set and yield”
e5“Control plants were grown under 16-h photoperiod”
Title
T. G. Shibaeva; E. G. Sherudilo Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2015. doi:10.1134/s1021443715030176
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect DROP under continuous lighting prevented leaf chlorosis in tomato.
- Intervention effect DROP under continuous lighting enlarged leaf area in tomato.
- Intervention effect DROP under continuous lighting increased plant biomass in tomato.
- Intervention effect In DROP-treated tomato plants no adverse aftereffects of continuous lighting were observed in subsequent development.
- Intervention effect DROP-treated tomato plants did not differ from control plants in time to flowering, fruit set or total yield.
- Intervention effect DROP-treated tomato plants had superior early fruit yield compared with control plants.
- Intervention effect Continuous lighting applied in the pre-reproductive period reduced fruit set and yield in tomato compared with control plants.