Claim · model-written summary
Cardboard packaging showed lower weight loss than plastic crate packaging after storage (24.8% vs 27.5%).
- Taxon
- Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuume0 - Treatment
- cardboard packaginge1
- Outcome
- weight losse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 24,8%e1
- Qualifier
- crate packaging weight losses 27,5%e1
- Comparator
- plastic cratee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Red chili ( Capsicum annuum L.)”
e1“The cardboard packaging is better than using plastic crate when viewed in terms of increased weight loss (crate packaging weight losses 27,5%, cardboard packaging weight loss 24,8% after storage)”
Title
The Effect of Plastic Crate and Cardboard Packaging on The Physical Quality of Fresh Red Chili
S P Siahaan; Y A Purwanto IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2022. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1024/1/012014
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Intervention effect Plastic crate packaging kept higher moisture content than cardboard packaging during storage (82% to 74% vs 81% to 75%).
- Observation Storage in plastic crate and cardboard kept chili hardness around 2.15-2.20 N after storage.
- Observation Colour changes (L, a, b) were seen in basket packaging and cardboard packaging.