Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Farm yard manure amendment gave greater leaf quality in mulberry.

A claim from Utilization of farm yard manure as a source of nutrients for sustainable mulberry production · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure amendment gave greater leaf quality in mulberry.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
amendments of farm yard manure (FYM)e0
Outcome
leaf qualitye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“sustainable mulberry production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92
e0

“improved soil properties, maximum leaf yield with greater leaf quality and maximum reduction of foliar diseases infestation were identified for amendments of farm yard manure (FYM) in soil for mulberry cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1101

Title

Utilization of farm yard manure as a source of nutrients for sustainable mulberry production

Faruque Ahmed; Nasir Uddin Ahmed; Rafia Sultana; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2022. doi:10.33545/2664844x.2022.v4.i1a.64

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e5baa38abadfca8766a215c72029d40da39f933b18e082a60acd9364a9c4f051 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: general · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Replacing 50% of chemical N or P with VAM fungi, bacterial biofertilizer or both did not affect mulberry leaf quality or cocoon parameters.

    EFFECT OF VAM FUNGI AND BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZERS ON MULBERRY LEAF QUALITY AND SILKWORM COCOON CHARACTERS UNDER SEMIARID CONDITIONS · 2007 · compared with Control (only 100% NPK)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Reduced chemical fertilizer in T7 did not affect mulberry leaf yield or quality.

    Efficacy of Cyanobacterial Biofertilizer (CBB) on Leaf Yield and Quality of Mulberry and its Impact on Silkworm Cocoon Characters · 2006

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Full recommended-dose fertigation gave the best growth, leaf yield and quality, statistically at par with 75% fertigation.

    Improved mulberry productivity and resource efficiency through low-cost drip fertigation · 2020 · compared with 75% RD fertigation

    Same direction

  4. positive
    T9 had superior mulberry leaf quality and was at par with the full NPK control.

    Effect of cyanobacterial biofertilizer on soil nutrients and mulberry leaf quality and its impact on silkworm crops · 2015 · compared with control 772 (100% NPK)

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Composts with N, P and K improved plant growth characters, leaf yield and quality relative to compost alone or N, P and K alone.

    Comparative efficacy of different composts in 'S1' mulberry (Morus alba) under rainfed condition · 2002 · compared with any compost alone or only with N, P and K application

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The optimum fertilizer design could increase the high yield and quality of mulberry leaves in hilly areas of Sichuan Province.

    Springtime DNJ yield in mulberry leaves with NPK fertilizer treatments · 2012

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Combined fertilizer management produced better leaf yield and quality than the other treatments.

    Impact of Vermicompost on Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity of Mulberry · 2020 · compared with T2, T1 and T0 treatments

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined 100% NPK with FYM 10 t/ha and biochar 15 t/ha significantly increased quality parameters of V-1 tree mulberry leaf in the field.

    Effect of levels of mulberry shoots biochar, farm yard manure and NPK fertilizer on quality parameters of tree mulberry leaf · 2024

    Same direction

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.