Paper · 2020

Impact of Vermicompost on Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity of Mulberry

Faruque Ahmed; Md. Toufiq Iqbal

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Vermi-compost amendments in soil had a positive impact on soil physio-chemical properties, leaf yield & quality as well as suppresses of foliar diseases in mulberry plant. A two years’ field experiment was conducted in the experiment field at Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute (BSTRI), Rajshahi, Bangladesh to examine the effect of vermi-compost on soil properties, growth, leaf yield and quality as well as severity of foliar diseases of mulberry plant. This study consisted of 4 treatments: T0 = control, T1 = basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/year, T2 = only 5 MT vermicompost/ha/year and T3 = 5 MT vermi-compost/ha/year + basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/year. Results showed that the combined application of 5 MT vermicompost/ha/year + BSRTI recommend basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/year exposed better growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed by T2, T1 and T0 treatments respectively. Between the two cropping years the maximum leaf yield was 50.40 MT/ha/year in 2nd year crop which was 73.25% greater than the maximum leaf yield of control. The leaf quality viz: moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment. Furthermore, the soil physio-chemical properties viz: OC, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Cu and Zn except soil pH content were increased in 2nd year than the 1st year soil with maximum suppress of foliar diseases viz: leaf spot, powdery mildew, tukra and leaf rust in 2nd year for the treatment of T3. This study concluded that utilization of vermi-compost improves soil fertility, leaf productivity, leaf quality of mulberry plant and reduce the foliar diseases with the respect to cropping year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined vermicompost and basal fertilizer produced better mulberry growth than other treatments.

Taxon
mulberry plante0
Treatment
5 MT vermicompost/ha/year + BSRTI recommend basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/yeare0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
T2, T1 and T0 treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 5 MT vermicompost/ha/year + BSRTI recommend basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/year exposed better growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed by T2, T1 and T0 treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer management produced better leaf yield and quality than the other treatments.

Taxon
mulberry plante0
Treatment
5 MT vermicompost/ha/year + BSRTI recommend basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/yeare0
Outcome
leaf yield and qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
T2, T1 and T0 treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 5 MT vermicompost/ha/year + BSRTI recommend basal dose of N300P150K100 kg/ha/year exposed better growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed by T2, T1 and T0 treatments respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year maximum leaf yield was 50.40 MT/ha/year, 73.25% above control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
2nd year crope0
Outcome
maximum leaf yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
50.40 MT/ha/yeare0
Qualifier
73.25%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum leaf yield was 50.40 MT/ha/year in 2nd year crop which was 73.25% greater than the maximum leaf yield of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf moisture was 8.59 percentage greater under the same second-year fertilizer management than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
moisture (%)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
8.59e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble carbohydrate was 34.27 percentage greater in the second year than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate (%)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
34.27e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll was 31.75 percentage greater in the second year than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
total chlorophyll (mg/g)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
31.75e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein was 23.32 percentage greater in the second year than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
crude protein (%)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
23.32e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral content was 31.45 percentage greater in the second year than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
mineral (%)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
31.45e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar was 38.29 percentage greater in the second year than control.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
same fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
total sugar (%)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
38.29e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“moisture (%), soluble carbohydrate (%), total chlorophyll (mg/g), crude protein (%), mineral (%) and total sugar (%) were also 8.59, 34.27, 31.75, 23.32, 31.45 and 38.29 percentage respectively greater in 2nd year for the same fertilizer management over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil OC, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Cu, and Zn rose in the second year.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Outcome
OC, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Cu and Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
1st year soile0

Verbatim

e0

“soil physio-chemical properties viz: OC, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Cu and Zn except soil pH content were increased in 2nd year than the 1st year soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1551 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf spot, powdery mildew, and tukra were maximally suppressed under T3 in year two.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
leaf spot, powdery mildew, tukrae0
Direction
maximum suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum suppress of foliar diseases viz: leaf spot, powdery mildew, tukra and leaf rust in 2nd year for the treatment of T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1680 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf rust was maximally suppressed under T3 in year two.

Taxon
mulberry plante1
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
leaf ruste0
Direction
maximum suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum suppress of foliar diseases viz: leaf spot, powdery mildew, tukra and leaf rust in 2nd year for the treatment of T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1680 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf yield and quality of mulberry plant followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–887 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.