Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Effects of N Fertilization During Cultivation and Lactobacillus plantarum Inoculation at Ensiling on Chemical Composition and Bacterial Community of Mulberry Silage

Ping Li; Minghong You; Zhouhe Du; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As unconventional forage source, mulberry ( Morus alba L.) has been cultivated to alleviate animal feed shortages. This study aimed to investigate the effects of N fertilization during cultivation and Lactobacillus plantarum inoculation at ensiling on the chemical composition and bacterial community of mulberry silage. Mulberry was separately cultivated under two N fertilization rates (N1, 390 kg/ha/year; N2, 485 kg/ha/year) in 2016–2019, harvested on 30 April (the first-cut) and 15 June (the second-cut) in 2019, and then chopped for producing small bag silage. The silage was treated without (control) or with L. plantarum (LP, a recommended application rate of 10 5 cfu/g on fresh matter basis). After storage of 60 days in dark room at ambient temperature, silage was sampled for analysis of chemical and microbial compositions. Higher ( P < 0.05) final pH value and acetic acid content and lower ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content were found in silage of mulberry under N2 fertilization, resulting in more dry matter loss than that under N1 fertilization. Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased ( P < 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage, by advancing the dominance of Lactobacillus and reducing the abundance of Enterococcus and Enterobacter . In particular, inoculation of LP at ensiling decreased ( P < 0.05) dry matter loss and butyric acid content of first-cut silage. In conclusion, inoculation of LP at ensiling could reduce the undesirable effects from high N fertilization rate during cultivation on silage quality of mulberry harvested at different growing seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulberry silage under N2 fertilization had higher final pH and acetic acid content than under N1 fertilization.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
N2 fertilizatione0
Outcome
final pH value and acetic acid contente0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
N1 fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher ( P < 0.05) final pH value and acetic acid content and lower ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content were found in silage of mulberry under N2 fertilization, resulting in more dry matter loss than that under N1 fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulberry silage under N2 fertilization had lower lactic acid content than under N1 fertilization.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
N2 fertilizatione0
Outcome
lactic acid contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
N1 fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher ( P < 0.05) final pH value and acetic acid content and lower ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content were found in silage of mulberry under N2 fertilization, resulting in more dry matter loss than that under N1 fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 fertilization resulted in more dry matter loss of mulberry silage than N1 fertilization.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
N2 fertilizatione0
Outcome
dry matter losse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
N1 fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher ( P < 0.05) final pH value and acetic acid content and lower ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content were found in silage of mulberry under N2 fertilization, resulting in more dry matter loss than that under N1 fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of L. plantarum (LP) at ensiling increased lactic acid content of mulberry silage compared with control.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
LPe0other
Outcome
lactic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased ( P < 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of LP at ensiling decreased final pH, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of mulberry silage compared with control.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
LPe0other
Outcome
final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased ( P < 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LP inoculation advanced the dominance of Lactobacillus in mulberry silage.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
LactobacillusLactobacilluse0other
Outcome
dominance of Lactobacilluse0
Direction
advancinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactobacillus
Lactobacillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo Credit: Janice Carr Content Providers(s): CDC/Dr. Mike Miller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased ( P < 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage, by advancing the dominance of Lactobacillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LP inoculation reduced the abundance of Enterococcus and Enterobacter in mulberry silage.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
EnterococcusEnterococcuse0other
Second interactor
EnterobacterEnterobactere0other
Outcome
abundance of Enterococcus and Enterobactere0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Enterococcus
Enterococcus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo Credit: Content Providers(s): CDC/Dr. Mike Miller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control, inoculation of LP at ensiling increased ( P < 0.05) lactic acid content and decreased ( P < 0.05) final pH value, acetic acid and propionic acid contents of silage, by advancing the dominance of Lactobacillus and reducing the abundance of Enterococcus and Enterobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LP inoculation at ensiling decreased dry matter loss and butyric acid content of first-cut mulberry silage.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
LPe0other
Outcome
dry matter loss and butyric acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
first-cut silagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of LP at ensiling decreased ( P < 0.05) dry matter loss and butyric acid content of first-cut silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that LP inoculation at ensiling could reduce the undesirable effects of high N fertilization during cultivation on silage quality of mulberry harvested in different seasons.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculation of LP at ensilinge0
Interactor
LPe0other
Outcome
silage qualitye0
Direction
reduce the undesirable effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of LP at ensiling could reduce the undesirable effects from high N fertilization rate during cultivation on silage quality of mulberry harvested at different growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1686 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Full NPK produced higher soil fertility status.

    Mulberry Leaf Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility as Influenced by Inorganic Fertilizers and Biofertilizers Under Intercropping System · 2013 · compared with application of Azophos 15 kg /ha/year with 50 per cent recommended N and P fertilizers

    Opposite direction

See all 2 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · Enterococcus · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · quality: general · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.