Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flowering-stage leaf removal slightly enhanced white-wine quality.

A claim from Increasing grapevine canopy height to compensate for pre-flowering basal leaf removal · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering-stage leaf removal slightly enhanced white-wine quality.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
LR applied at the flowering stagee0
Outcome
overall quality of the white winee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
pre-flowering LRe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to pre-flowering LR, LR applied at the flowering stage decreased acidity and yeast assimilable nitrogen concentrations, increased the concentration of the aroma precursor Cys-3MH in the must at harvest, and slightly enhanced the overall quality of the white wine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1652
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–20

Title

Increasing grapevine canopy height to compensate for pre-flowering basal leaf removal

Thibaut Verdenal; Vivian Zufferey; Àgnes Dienes-Nagy; et al. OENO One 2025. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2025.59.2.8451

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e603df89956a204a12c3fb2ba15cd5890061fe7c001688d4c280ab3e347baf5d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

stage · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.