Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vegetative-stage spraying increased cotton boll weight, seed index and cotton yield compared with control.

A claim from Effect of concentration and date of spraying with trace elements on growth and yield of cotton plant ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage spraying increased cotton boll weight, seed index and cotton yield compared with control.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
spraying date in the vegetative growth stagee0
Outcome
weight of the existing boll, seed index, cotton yield Cast irone0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton plant ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–125
e0

“Especially when adopting the spraying date in the vegetative growth stage as the vegetative growth characteristics increased (plant height, number of nodes until the first fruit branch, number of vegetative branches, number of fruiting branches) and quantity yield characteristics (number of bolls, weight of the existing boll, seed index, cotton yield Cast iron) and qualitative yield characteristics (staple index, percentage of hair, earliness percentage) and the interaction coefficients between spray concentrations and dates compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1421

Title

Effect of concentration and date of spraying with trace elements on growth and yield of cotton plant ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Mohammad Ali Al-Assaf; Raad Lahoob Abbud IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012034

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e6d269f98e1850204bf4ce8e70d2824a62c3707fa47841cc4d35676c31fa22da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Flowering-stage waterlogging had the greatest yield reduction, 38.8%.

    Effect of Waterlogging Duration at Different Growth Stages on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton · 2017

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Shade during squaring and early flowering had little effect on boll weight.

    COTTON RESPONSES TO SHADE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES: GROWTH, LINT YIELD AND FIBRE QUALITY · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    High night temperature during flowering reduced seeds per locule and seeds per boll.

    High Night Temperatures During the Floral Bud Stage Increase the Abscission of Reproductive Structures in Cotton · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stress in the latter half of flowering reduced boll retention, number and weight.

    Effects of Soil Moisture Stress on Two Varieties of Upland Cotton in Israel I. The Coastal Plain Region · 1971

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Seed cotton yield declined by 24.7% under skipped irrigation relative to normal irrigation.

    Kaolin and Jasmonic acid improved cotton productivity under water stress conditions · 2021 · compared with Normal irrigated crop

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Seed cotton production was more affected by saline water applied at the flowering and boll formation stages.

    Gas exchanges and production of colored cotton irrigated with saline water at different phenological stages · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Peak flowering water deficit reduced cotton yield more than early or late stress.

    WATER STRESS during flowering of cotton · 1970 · compared with stress periods of comparable length imposed either early or late in the flowering period

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    DU defoliant applied at 60 days after flowering reduced seed cotton yield, boll number, boll weight and lint index.

    Effect of different defoliants and application times on the yield and quality components of cotton in semi-arid conditions · 2010

    Opposite direction

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar methanol did not increase cotton yield at any location.

    Foliar Methanol Applications to Cotton in the Southeastern United States: Leaf Physiology, Growth, and Yield Components · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Fluazifop at four weeks gave cotton 93% of weed-free yield.

    Growth and Interaction of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) by Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 1991 · compared with weed-free cotton

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Peak flowering spraying somewhat reduced weight of late opening bolls.

    Cotton Flowering and Fruiting Responses to Application Timing of Chemical Growth Retardants1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers produced no significant yield response.

    Effects of foliar fertilization of texas southern high plains cotton: Leaf phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese, boron, calcium, and yield distribution · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    First-harvest lint yield was generally unaffected by foliar treatments.

    Influence of surfactants on potassium uptake and yield response of cotton to foliar potassium nitrate · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar fertilizers did not significantly affect lint or seed yield.

    Effects of Foliar Fertilization of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton: Leaf Nitrogen and Growth Parameters · 1998

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    A single 1 mL water spray reduced cotton seed set by 55%.

    Sprinkler‐Induced Flower Losses and Yield Reductions in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Lint yields were similar with early or early plus midseason glyphosate sprays.

    Timing of Glyphosate Application on Control of Silverleaf Nightshade and Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Yield · 2006

    Opposite direction

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.