Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chickpea yield increased markedly under weed control practices and crop mulches compared with control plots

A claim from Weed dynamics as affected by practices and straw mulches in chickpea · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield increased markedly under weed control practices and crop mulches compared with control plots

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
different weed control practices and crop mulchese5
Outcome
chickpea yielde5
Direction
increased markedlye5
Comparator
control plotse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed dynamics as affected by practices and straw mulches in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68
e5

“The chickpea yield was minimum (0.87 t/ha) in control plots, which was increased markedly under different weed control practices and crop mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1715

Title

Weed dynamics as affected by practices and straw mulches in chickpea

Muni Pratap Sahu; Mewa Lal Kewat; Amit Kumar Jha; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4s.9899

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e709853511944134d8aac03788535788dde56ef9830311dd7d819c916585b6b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

mulching · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.