Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize Monica 350 MV under disc harrow «AG-2.4» at a depth of 15-17 cm yielded 8.64 t/ha.

A claim from Comprehensive assessment of the influence of basic soil cultivation and fertilizing on structural elements, grain yield and green mass of corn · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize Monica 350 MV under disc harrow «AG-2.4» at a depth of 15-17 cm yielded 8.64 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
Monica 350 MVe1
Treatment
disc harrow «AG-2.4» at a depth of 15-17 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.64 t/hae0
Comparator
same fertilizer variante0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“utilizing the disc harrow «AG-2.4» at a depth of 15-17 cm with the same fertilizer variant resulted in a lower yield of 8.64 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1151
e1

“for the maize hybrid «Monica 350 MV»”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–828

Title

Comprehensive assessment of the influence of basic soil cultivation and fertilizing on structural elements, grain yield and green mass of corn

T. Panchenko; M. Novokhatskyi; Leonid Pogorilyi UkrNDIPVT; et al. Technical and technological aspects of development and testing of new machinery and technologies for agriculture of Ukraine 2023. doi:10.31473/2305-5987-2023-2-33(47)-7

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e71ada9e7a8a241505bd643d5c1a0f6f9e0e7cb19ab78900849449d8e5fb6fe3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.