Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 (FACE) stimulated the number of shoots per stool in poplar coppice.

A claim from Elevated CO2 concentration, fertilization and their interaction: growth stimulation in a short-rotation poplar coppice (EUROFACE) · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 (FACE) stimulated the number of shoots per stool in poplar coppice.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE)e1
Outcome
number of shoots per stoole1
Direction
stimulatede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aboveground growth of three poplar species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–145
e1

“Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) stimulated the number of shoots per stool, leaf area index measured with a fish-eye-type plant canopy analyzer (LAIoptical), and annual leaf production, but did not affect dominant shoot height or canopy productivity index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–592

Title

Elevated CO2 concentration, fertilization and their interaction: growth stimulation in a short-rotation poplar coppice (EUROFACE)

M. Liberloo; S. Y. Dillen; C. Calfapietra; et al. Tree Physiology 2005. doi:10.1093/treephys/25.2.179

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e769a76525b4454e441cab832b65e2b008d84d7ca27dead3489b35e7082aa9b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.