co2 · Growth · Populus (poplar)

Effects of CO2 Enrichment on Four Poplar Clones. I. Growth and Leaf Anatomy · 1990

• positive
  CO2 enrichment increased leaf number, stem length and total leaf area.
• positive
  CO2 enrichment increased growth rate and leaf and stem dry mass.
• no effect
  CO2 enrichment did not change leaf size.
• no effect
  CO2 enrichment did not change biomass allocation.

cited by 5 papers here

Leaf growth of hybrid poplar following exposure to elevated CO₂ · 1995

• positive
  Measurements suggested elevated CO2 stimulated total leaf area across poplar hybrids.
• no effect
  Elevated CO2 did not significantly increase leaf number in any interamerican clone.
• no effect
  Primo cumulative leaf length was not significantly affected by CO2.

cites 1 paper herecited by 3 papers here

Interacting effects of soil fertility and atmospheric CO₂ on leaf area growth and carbon gain physiology in Populus×euramericana (Dode) Guinier · 1995

• positive
  At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased total dry weight by 49%.
• positive
  At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased maximum individual leaf size.
• positive
  At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased seasonal leaf area duration.
• positive
  At low fertility, CO2 increased total dry weight by 25%.
• positive
  At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased total leaf number.
• no effect
  At low fertility, leaf area growth was unaffected by CO2 treatment.

cites 1 paper herecited by 2 papers here

Effect of CO $_{2}$ Enrichment on Growth of two Poplar Clones, I-214 (Populus euramericana) and Peace (P. koreana $\times$ P. trichocarpa) · 1995

• positive
  Total dry weight in Peace increased up to 2,000 μL·L-1 carbon dioxide.
• positive
  Elevated carbon dioxide stimulated growth of plant parts, especially leaf dry weight, in both poplar clones.
• positive
  Carbon dioxide enrichment at 2,000 μL·L-1 enhanced net assimilation rate in Peace.
• positive
  Carbon dioxide enrichment at 700 μL·L-1 increased net assimilation rate.
• no effect
  Carbon dioxide enrichment at 2,000 μL·L-1 had little effect on net assimilation rate in I-214.
• no effect
  Total dry weight in I-214 did not increase up to 2,000 μL·L-1 carbon dioxide.

First- and second-year aboveground growth and productivity of two Populus hybrids grown at ambient and elevated CO2 · 1996

• positive
  Robusta increased height growth, leaf biomass and total leaf nitrogen under elevated CO2.
• positive
  Beaupré increased leaf area and leaf area index in both seasons.
• no effect
  Robusta had no increase in leaf area index.

cited by 4 papers here

Modelling the effects of elevated atmospheric CO₂ on crown development, light interception and photosynthesis of poplar in open top chambers · 1997

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased leaf area in both poplar clones.

Responses of two Populus clones to elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentration in the field · 1999

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased branch and leaf biomass and stem volume in clone I-214.

cites 1 paper herecited by 3 papers here

Growth performance of Populus exposed to "Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment" during the first growing season in the POPFACE experiment · 2001

• positive
  All three poplar genotypes showed enhanced growth under FACE, with differing response sizes.

  compared with ambient CO 2 (Control)

cites 4 papers herecited by 5 papers here

Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment · 2001

• positive
  FACE increased individual leaf size.
• positive
  FACE increased allometric LAI.
• no effect
  FACE did not significantly affect optical LAI after canopy closure.
• negative
  FACE reduced optical LAI in stands of similar size.

  compared with stands of similar size

• no effect
  Specific leaf area was unaffected by FACE.

cites 1 paper herecited by 7 papers here

Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation · 2003

• positive
  Belowground biomass increased 22 to 38% under elevated CO2.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased aboveground woody biomass by 15 to 27% after three seasons.
• no effect
  Aboveground biomass allocation was unaffected by elevated CO2.

cites 5 papers herecited by 5 papers here

Do above‐ground growth dynamics of poplar change with time under CO₂enrichment? · 2003

• positive
  The authors concluded that elevated CO2 stimulated poplar growth only in the first year.

cites 7 papers herecited by 2 papers here

Production, turnover and mycorrhizal colonization of root systems of three Populus species grown under elevated CO₂ (POPFACE) · 2003

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased fine root biomass by 35–84%.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased standing root biomass across three Populus species by 47–76%.

cites 1 paper herecited by 3 papers here

Growth of a poplar short rotation coppice under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (EUROFACE) depends on fertilization and species · 2004

• positive
  FACE increased LAI by 5.5 to 16.4% in September, depending on species.
• positive
  FACE increased shoots per stool.
• no effect
  FACE did not significantly increase height or total basal area per stool.

cites 4 papers herecited by 1 paper here

Profiles of isoprene emission and photosynthetic parameters in hybrid poplars exposed to free‐air CO₂ enrichment^† · 2004

• positive
  Elevated CO2 plants produced more leaves than ambient CO2 plants.

  compared with ambient [CO 2 ]

cites 1 paper here

Elevated CO2 concentration, fertilization and their interaction: growth stimulation in a short-rotation poplar coppice (EUROFACE) · 2005

• positive
  Elevated CO2 (FACE) increased biomass of poplar coppice.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 (FACE) stimulated leaf area index of poplar coppice, measured with a canopy analyzer.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 (FACE) stimulated the number of shoots per stool in poplar coppice.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 (FACE) initially stimulated absolute and relative growth rates of poplar, and the stimulation disappeared after the first growing season following coppicing.
• no effect
  Elevated CO2 (FACE) did not affect dominant shoot height of poplar coppice.

cites 4 papers herecited by 1 paper here

Elevated CO2 protects poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides) from damage induced by O3: identification of mechanisms · 2005

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased all measured growth variables.

  compared with 350 µL L–1

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased mainstem dry weight by 32% in year 2.

  compared with 350 µL L–1

• positive
  Elevated CO2 tended to increase leaf expansion.
• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased mainstem dry weight by 38% in year 1.

  compared with 350 µL L–1

cites 3 papers here

Adaptation of tree growth to elevated CO₂: quantitative trait loci for biomass in Populus · 2007

• positive
  Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased above ground growth in F2 poplar.

  compared with current day ambient CO(2) (a[CO(2)])

• positive
  Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased below ground growth in F2 poplar.

  compared with current day ambient CO(2) (a[CO(2)])

cites 4 papers here

Woody tissue photosynthesis increases radial stem growth of young poplar trees under ambient atmospheric CO2 but its contribution ceases under elevated CO2 · 2020

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased stem growth of control trees by 18%.

  compared with control

• positive
  Elevated CO2 increased stem growth of light-excluded trees by 50%.

  compared with light-excluded trees

• no effect
  Elevated CO2 and woody tissue photosynthesis had little effect on stem growth late in the season.

cites 2 papers here