Paper · 1995 · New Phytologist

Interacting effects of soil fertility and atmospheric CO2 on leaf area growth and carbon gain physiology in Populus×euramericana (Dode) Guinier

PETER S. CURTIS; CHRISTOPH S. VOGEL; KURT S. PREGITZER; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
117
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Two important processes which may limit productivity gains in forest ecosystems with rising atmospheric CO 2 are reduction in photosynthetic capacity following prolonged exposure to high CO 2 and diminution of positive growth responses when soil nutrients, particularly N, are limiting. To examine the interacting effects of soil fertility and CO 2 enrichment on photosynthesis and growth in trees we grew hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana ) for 158 d in the field at ambient and twice ambient CO 2 and in soil with low or high N availability. We measured the timing and rate of canopy development, the seasonal dynamics of leaf level photosynthetic capacity, respiration, and N and carbohydrate concentration, and final above‐ and belowground dry weight. Single leaf net CO 2 assimilation (A) increased at elevated CO 2 over the majority of the growing season in both fertility treatments. At high fertility, the maximum size of individual leaves, total leaf number, and seasonal leaf area duration (LAD) also increased at elevated CO 2 , leading to a 49% increase in total dry weight. In contrast, at low fertility leaf area growth was unaffected by CO 2 treatment. Total dry weight nonetheless increased 25% due to CO 2 effects on A. Photosynthetic capacity (A at constant internal p(CO 2 ), (( C 1 )) was reduced in high CO 2 plants after 100 d growth at low fertility and 135 d growth at high fertility. Analysis of A responses to changing C 1 indicated that this negative adjustment of photosynthesis was due to a reduction in the maximum rate of CO 2 fixation by Rubisco. Maximum rate of electron transport and phosphate regeneration capacity were either unaffected or declined at elevated CO 2 . Carbon dioxide effects on leaf respiration were most pronounced at high fertility, with increased respiration mid‐season and no change (area basis) or reduced (mass basis) respiration late‐season in elevated compared to ambient CO 2 plants. This temporal variation correlated with changes in leaf N concentration and leaf mass per area. Our results demonstrate the importance of considering both structural and physiological pathways of net C gain in predicting tree responses to rising CO 2 under conditions of suboptimal soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased single-leaf net assimilation through most of the season in both fertility treatments.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Single leaf net CO 2 assimilation (A)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both fertility treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single leaf net CO 2 assimilation (A) increased at elevated CO 2 over the majority of the growing season in both fertility treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased maximum individual leaf size.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
maximum size of individual leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
At high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high fertility, the maximum size of individual leaves, total leaf number, and seasonal leaf area duration (LAD) also increased at elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased total leaf number.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
total leaf numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
At high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high fertility, the maximum size of individual leaves, total leaf number, and seasonal leaf area duration (LAD) also increased at elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased seasonal leaf area duration.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
seasonal leaf area duration (LAD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
At high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high fertility, the maximum size of individual leaves, total leaf number, and seasonal leaf area duration (LAD) also increased at elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased total dry weight by 49%.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
49%e0
Qualifier
At high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high fertility, the maximum size of individual leaves, total leaf number, and seasonal leaf area duration (LAD) also increased at elevated CO 2 , leading to a 49% increase in total dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low fertility, leaf area growth was unaffected by CO2 treatment.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
leaf area growthe0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
low fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at low fertility leaf area growth was unaffected by CO 2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low fertility, CO2 increased total dry weight by 25%.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse2
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
Total dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
low fertilitye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total dry weight nonetheless increased 25% due to CO 2 effects on A.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“at low fertility leaf area growth was unaffected by CO 2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1180 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced photosynthetic capacity after 100 days at low fertility.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
Photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
100 de0
Qualifier
low fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic capacity (A at constant internal p(CO 2 ), (( C 1 )) was reduced in high CO 2 plants after 100 d growth at low fertility and 135 d growth at high fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced photosynthetic capacity after 135 days at high fertility.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
Photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
135 de0
Qualifier
high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic capacity (A at constant internal p(CO 2 ), (( C 1 )) was reduced in high CO 2 plants after 100 d growth at low fertility and 135 d growth at high fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute photosynthetic downregulation to reduced maximum Rubisco CO2 fixation.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Gene
Rubiscoe0
Outcome
negative adjustment of photosynthesise0
Qualifier
reduction in the maximum rate of CO 2 fixatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this negative adjustment of photosynthesis was due to a reduction in the maximum rate of CO 2 fixation by Rubisco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum electron transport was unaffected or declined under elevated CO2.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Maximum rate of electron transporte0
Direction
unaffected or declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rate of electron transport and phosphate regeneration capacity were either unaffected or declined at elevated CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1716 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate regeneration capacity was unaffected or declined under elevated CO2.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
phosphate regeneration capacitye0
Direction
unaffected or declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rate of electron transport and phosphate regeneration capacity were either unaffected or declined at elevated CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1716 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, elevated CO2 increased mid-season leaf respiration.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
Carbon dioxidee0
Outcome
leaf respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
high fertilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon dioxide effects on leaf respiration were most pronounced at high fertility, with increased respiration mid‐season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1837 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, late-season leaf respiration per area was unchanged under elevated CO2.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse2
Treatment
elevatede0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
no changee0
Qualifier
area basise0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no change (area basis) or reduced (mass basis) respiration late‐season in elevated compared to ambient CO 2 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1957 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbon dioxide effects on leaf respiration were most pronounced at high fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1798 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fertility, late-season leaf respiration per mass declined under elevated CO2.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse2
Treatment
elevatede0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
mass basise0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no change (area basis) or reduced (mass basis) respiration late‐season in elevated compared to ambient CO 2 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1957 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbon dioxide effects on leaf respiration were most pronounced at high fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1798 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temporal respiration variation correlated with leaf nitrogen and leaf mass per area.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Compound
leaf Ne0
Outcome
temporal variatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This temporal variation correlated with changes in leaf N concentration and leaf mass per area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2053 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid poplar ( Populus × euramericana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.