Paper · 2001 · Annals of Forest Science

Growth performance of Populus exposed to "Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment" during the first growing season in the POPFACE experiment

Carlo Calfapietra; Birgit Gielen; Maurizio Sabatti; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
41
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Stem diameter, total plant height and number of sylleptic branches of three poplar (Populus) genotypes were followed during the first growing season of a high density intensively cultured plantation (in Central Italy) both under ambient CO 2 (Control) and under elevated atmospheric CO 2 (550 ppm) using the FACE technique. The three poplar genotypes belonged to different species of Populus alba L., Populus nigra L. and Populus x euramericana Dode (Guinier). All three genotypes responded by an enhanced growth performance but the extent of their response to the FACE treatment was different. A stem volume index was calculated considering the stem composed by a truncated cone in the lower part and by a cone in the upper part. At the end of the first growing season, stem volume index was increased in the FACE treatment by 54% to 79% as compared to Control treatment, depending on the genotype. This increased stem volume index was caused by an increase of basal stem diameter rather than by an enhancement of plant height. Number of sylleptic branches was stimulated by more than 35% in the P. nigra genotype. The results confirm the optimal performance of this new POPFACE experiment and show the positive response of this fast-growing tree species to elevated CO 2 conditions at an ecosystem scale even if considering the genotypic differences. elevated CO 2 / FACE / short-rotation intensive culture / Populus / growth Rsum -Performance de croissance de plants de Populus exposs une atmosphre enrichie en dioxide de carbone durant la premire saison de croissance dans l'exprimentation POPFACE. Le diamtre du tronc, la hauteur totale et le nombre des branches sylleptiques de trois gnotypes de peuplier (Populus) ont t suivis durant la premire saison de croissance d'une plantation de haute densit en culture intensive (en Italie Centrale), la fois sous air ambiant (350 ppm, plantes tmoins), et sous atmosphre enrichie en CO 2 (550 ppm) en utilisant la technique FACE. Les trois gnotypes de peuplier utiliss font partie d'espces diffrentes : Populus alba L., Populus nigra L. et Populus x euramericana Dode (Guinier). Les trois gnotypes ont tous rpondu au traitement FACE par une augmentation de la croissance, mais avec des intensit diffrentes. Un index de volume du tronc a t calcul en considrant le tronc comme tant compos d'un cne tronqu pour sa partie infrieure, et d'un cne pour la partie suprieure. la fin de la saison de croissance, l'index de volume du tronc tait suprieur de 54 % 79 %, en fonction du gnotype, pour le traitement FACE par rapport aux plants tmoins. Cette augmentation de l'index de volume du tronc est principalement due l'augmentation du diamtre basal des troncs, plus qu'

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three poplar genotypes showed enhanced growth under FACE, with differing response sizes.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse1
Treatment
FACE treatmente0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 (Control)e1
Setting
Central Italye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three genotypes responded by an enhanced growth performance but the extent of their response to the FACE treatment was different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–594 · show in text ↑
e1

“three poplar (Populus) genotypes were followed during the first growing season of a high density intensively cultured plantation (in Central Italy) both under ambient CO 2 (Control) and under elevated atmospheric CO 2 (550 ppm) using the FACE technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FACE increased poplar stem volume index by 54% to 79% relative to control, depending on genotype.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
FACE treatmente0
Outcome
stem volume indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54% to 79%e0
Qualifier
depending on the genotypee0
Comparator
Control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem volume index was increased in the FACE treatment by 54% to 79% as compared to Control treatment, depending on the genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in stem volume index was driven by basal stem diameter increase.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Organ / stage
basal stem diametere0
Outcome
stem volume indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increased stem volume index was caused by an increase of basal stem diameter rather than by an enhancement of plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sylleptic branch number rose by more than 35% in the P. nigra genotype.

Taxon
P. nigraPopulus nigrae0
Treatment
elevated atmospheric CO 2 (550 ppm)e1
Outcome
Number of sylleptic branchese0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
more than 35%e0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 (Control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus nigra
Populus nigra · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of sylleptic branches was stimulated by more than 35% in the P. nigra genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“under elevated atmospheric CO 2 (550 ppm) using the FACE technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient CO 2 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–251 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.