Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased below ground growth in F2 poplar.

A claim from Adaptation of tree growth to elevated CO2: quantitative trait loci for biomass in Populus · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased below ground growth in F2 poplar.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Material
F(2)e0
Treatment
e[CO(2)] at 600 microl l(-1)e2
Outcome
below-ground growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
current day ambient CO(2) (a[CO(2)])e2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the F(2) generation, both above- and below-ground growth showed a significant increase in e[CO(2)].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–671
e1

“poplar (Populus trichocarpa and Populus deltoides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–399
e2

“either current day ambient CO(2) (a[CO(2)]) or e[CO(2)] at 600 microl l(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–510

Title

Adaptation of tree growth to elevated CO2: quantitative trait loci for biomass in Populus

Anne M. Rae; Penny J. Tricker; Stephen M. Bunn; et al. New Phytologist 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02091.x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e663123e5c2cbb70a1007ee23e9a4efc36a7e8ff985e90feb23c6407e692909c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.