Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glutathione reductase activity did not change in leaves of flooded plants.

A claim from Stress responses of spring rape plants to soil flooding · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione reductase activity did not change in leaves of flooded plants.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
flooded plantse1
Outcome
Glutathione reductase activitye1
Direction
did not changee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stress responses of spring rape plants to soil flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55
e1

“Glutathione reductase activity increased by 45% in roots of flooded plants but did not change in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–802

Title

Stress responses of spring rape plants to soil flooding

T. Balakhnina; R. Bennicelli; Z. Stêpniewska; et al. International Agrophysics 2012. doi:10.2478/v10247-012-0049-z

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e79b4e447dea3789a967584a45d41224ef5691126e839bcb9b557db36c8aca73 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

flooding · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.