Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiencies were higher at NF3 (N 150 kg ha-1).

A claim from Resources use efficiency of field grown transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under irrigated semiarid environment. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiencies were higher at NF3 (N 150 kg ha-1).

Treatment
NF3 (N 150 kg ha -1 )e0
Outcome
Agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficienciese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic and economic nitrogen use efficiencies were higher at NF3 (N 150 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2263–2348
t0

“field grown transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–75

Title

Resources use efficiency of field grown transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under irrigated semiarid environment.

Shakeel Ahmad; Ashfaq Ahmad; Muhammad Zia Ul Haq; et al. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 2009

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e7f797fdae5a095b8a15e35a4647a55767c6d5a53eafa027cbe8d4342ab5d5d3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this claim · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

253 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.