Paper · 2021 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effects of nitrogen application rate and hill density on rice yield and nitrogen utilization in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fields

Xiao-hong GUO; Yu-chen LAN; Ling-qi XU; et al.

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Soil salinity and alkalinity can inhibit crop growth and reduce yield, and this has become a global environmental concern. Combined changes in nitrogen (N) application and hill density can improve rice yields in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fields and protect the environment. We investigated the interactive effects of N application rate and hill density on rice yield and N accumulation, translocation and utilization in two field experiments during 2018 and 2019 in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fields. Five N application rates (0 (control), 90, 120, 150, and 180 kg N ha–1 (N0–N4), respectively) and three hill densities (achieved by altering the distance between hills, in rows spaced 30 cm apart: 16.5 cm (D1), 13.3 cm (D2) and 10 cm (D3)) were utilized in a split-plot design with three replicates. Nitrogen application rate and hill density significantly affected grain yield. The mathematical model of quadratic saturated D-optimal design showed that with an N application rate in the range of 0–180 kg N ha–1, the highest yield was obtained at 142.61 kg N ha–1 which matched with a planting density of 33.3×104 ha–1. Higher grain yield was mainly attributed to the increase in panicles m–2. Nitrogen application rate and hill density significantly affected N accumulation in the aboveground parts of rice plants and showed a highly significant positive correlation with grain yield at maturity. From full heading to maturity, the average N loss rate of the aboveground parts of rice plants in N4 was 70.21% higher than that of N3. This is one of the reasons why the yield of N4 treatment is lower than that of the N3 treatment. Nitrogen accumulation rates in the aboveground parts under treatment N3 (150 kg N ha–1) were 81.68 and 106.07% higher in 2018 and 2019, respectively, than those in the control. The N translocation and N translocation contribution rates increased with the increase in the N application rate and hill density, whereas N productivity of dry matter and grain first increased and then decreased with the increase in N application rate and hill density. Agronomic N-use efficiency decreased with an increase in N application rate, whereas hill density did not significantly affect it. Nitrogen productivity of dry matter and grain, and agronomic N-use efficiency, were negatively correlated with grain yield. Thus, rice yield in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fields can be improved by combined changes in the N application rate and hill density to promote aboveground N accumulation. Our study provides novel evidence regarding optimal N application rates and hill densities for sodic saline–alkaline rice paddies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application rate and hill density significantly affected grain yield.

Treatment
Nitrogen application rate and hill densitye0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application rate and hill density significantly affected grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted highest yield at 142.61 kg N ha–1 with planting density 33.3×104 ha–1.

Treatment
planting density of 33.3×104 ha–1e0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Value
142.61 kg N ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield was obtained at 142.61 kg N ha–1 which matched with a planting density of 33.3×104 ha–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grain yield was mainly attributed to more panicles per square metre.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
increase in panicles m–2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher grain yield was mainly attributed to the increase in panicles m–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and hill density significantly affected aboveground rice nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
Nitrogen application rate and hill densitye0
Outcome
N accumulation in the aboveground parts of rice plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application rate and hill density significantly affected N accumulation in the aboveground parts of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1319 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground nitrogen accumulation was highly significantly positively correlated with grain yield at maturity.

Organ / stage
maturitye0
Outcome
grain yield at maturitye0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed a highly significant positive correlation with grain yield at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From full heading to maturity, N4 had an aboveground nitrogen loss rate 70.21% higher than N3.

Organ / stage
full heading to maturitye0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
average N loss rate of the aboveground parts of rice plantse0
Direction
highere0
Value
70.21%e0
Comparator
N3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From full heading to maturity, the average N loss rate of the aboveground parts of rice plants in N4 was 70.21% higher than that of N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 yielded less than N3.

Treatment
N4 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
N3 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of N4 treatment is lower than that of the N3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 aboveground nitrogen accumulation rate was 81.68% above control in 2018.

Treatment
N3 (150 kg N ha–1)e0
Outcome
Nitrogen accumulation rates in the aboveground partse0
Direction
highere0
Value
81.68e0
Qualifier
2018e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen accumulation rates in the aboveground parts under treatment N3 (150 kg N ha–1) were 81.68 and 106.07% higher in 2018 and 2019, respectively, than those in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 aboveground nitrogen accumulation rate was 106.07% above control in 2019.

Treatment
N3 (150 kg N ha–1)e0
Outcome
Nitrogen accumulation rates in the aboveground partse0
Direction
highere0
Value
106.07%e0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen accumulation rates in the aboveground parts under treatment N3 (150 kg N ha–1) were 81.68 and 106.07% higher in 2018 and 2019, respectively, than those in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen translocation and its contribution rate increased with nitrogen application rate and hill density.

Treatment
N application rate and hill densitye0
Outcome
N translocation and N translocation contribution ratese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N translocation and N translocation contribution rates increased with the increase in the N application rate and hill density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1942 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen productivity of dry matter and grain first increased and then decreased with nitrogen rate and hill density.

Treatment
N application rate and hill densitye0
Outcome
N productivity of dry matter and graine0
Direction
first increased and then decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N productivity of dry matter and grain first increased and then decreased with the increase in N application rate and hill density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2082 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic nitrogen use efficiency decreased as nitrogen rate increased.

Treatment
N application ratee0
Outcome
Agronomic N-use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic N-use efficiency decreased with an increase in N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2159 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hill density did not significantly affect agronomic nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
hill densitye0
Outcome
Agronomic N-use efficiencye0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic N-use efficiency decreased with an increase in N application rate, whereas hill density did not significantly affect it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2213 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen productivity of dry matter and grain and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency were negatively correlated with grain yield.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Qualifier
Nitrogen productivity of dry matter and grain, and agronomic N-use efficiencye0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen productivity of dry matter and grain, and agronomic N-use efficiency, were negatively correlated with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2215–2337 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining nitrogen rate and hill density to promote aboveground nitrogen accumulation and improve rice yield.

Treatment
combined changes in the N application rate and hill densitye0
Outcome
rice yield in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice yield in sodic saline–alkaline paddy fields can be improved by combined changes in the N application rate and hill density to promote aboveground N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2510 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 217 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.