Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biochar with PGPR inoculation yielded significantly higher soil EC than other treatments.

A claim from Effect of Biochar and Microbial Inoculation on P, Fe, and Zn Bioavailability in a Calcareous Soil · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with PGPR inoculation yielded significantly higher soil EC than other treatments.

Treatment
biochar addition and PGPR inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EC following biochar addition and PGPR inoculation was significantly higher than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–921
e1

“on wheat growth and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–281

Title

Effect of Biochar and Microbial Inoculation on P, Fe, and Zn Bioavailability in a Calcareous Soil

Roghayeh Vahedi; Mir Hassan Rasouli-Sadaghiani; Mohsen Barin; et al. Processes 2022. doi:10.3390/pr10020343

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e816c64a9aa8eb02c5d4d427e0e95f13cd3e1dc81f3b6ca358bddfe19a048177 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

biochar · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 44 positive, 5 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.