Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Merlot, ordered FR above LR above ND.

A claim from Effects of Severity of Post-flowering Leaf Removal on Berry Growth and Composition of Three Red Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars Grown under Semiarid Conditions · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Merlot, ordered FR above LR above ND.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlote0
Treatment
Defoliatione0
Outcome
skin anthocyaninse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FR > LR > NDe0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation increased skin anthocyanins in Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon in the order FR > LR > ND but significantly reduced seed flavan-3-ols mainly as a result of the reduction in catechin and epicatechin amount.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1532
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113

Title

Effects of Severity of Post-flowering Leaf Removal on Berry Growth and Composition of Three Red Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars Grown under Semiarid Conditions

Yorgos Kotseridis; Afroditi Georgiadou; Panagiotis Tikos; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2012. doi:10.1021/jf300605j

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e826452ede27c453071d1bdd373a0d90237af27a7c43a2ff391a7d3cde9d2ccb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.