Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher number of cobs, biological yield and harvest index of sweet corn than minimum tillage.

A claim from Effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn: Pulses intercropping system · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher number of cobs, biological yield and harvest index of sweet corn than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest indexe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
minimum tillagee2
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679
e2

“than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–765
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69
e6

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137

Title

Effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn: Pulses intercropping system

AD Deshmane; MR Ghanbahadur; KR Chavhan The Pharma Innovation 2023. doi:10.22271/tpi.2023.v12.i3d.18959

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e881ba4661774e0faf285a17790d70996cb87af35a8c393df276b82f8f9a759a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.