Paper · 2023 · The Pharma Innovation

Effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn: Pulses intercropping system

AD Deshmane; MR Ghanbahadur; KR Chavhan

7
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out at Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013 to study the effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn - pulses intercropping system in FRBD with four replication. The main plot treatment viz., S1- Conventional tillage (one Ploughing and two harrowing), S2- Minimum tillage (one harrowing) and three sub-plot treatment of intercropping I1- Sole sweet corn, I2- Sweet corn+ Green gram (1:2 ratio), I3- Sweet corn + Black gram (1:2 ratio). The result revealed that conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage and among intercropping treatments sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1), NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1), B: C ratio (5.23) followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher number of cobs, biological yield and harvest index of sweet corn than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest indexe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
minimum tillagee2
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e6

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher GMR of sweet corn than minimum tillage (186507 ₹ ha-1).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
GMRe3
Direction
highere1
Value
186507 ₹ ha-1e3
Comparator
minimum tillagee2
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e6

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–765 · show in text ↑
e3

“GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher NMR of sweet corn than minimum tillage (148159 ₹ ha-1).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
NMRe4
Direction
highere1
Value
148159 ₹ ha-1e4
Comparator
minimum tillagee2
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e6

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–765 · show in text ↑
e4

“NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave a higher B:C ratio of sweet corn than minimum tillage (4.96).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
B: C ratioe5
Direction
highere1
Value
4.96e5
Comparator
minimum tillagee2
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e6

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–765 · show in text ↑
e5

“B: C ratio (4.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn with black gram had the highest GMR among the intercropping treatments (194698 ₹ ha-1).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
GMRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
194698 ₹ ha-1e0
Qualifier
followed by treatment sweet corn + green grame7
Comparator
among intercropping treatmentse6
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e5

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–861 · show in text ↑
e6

“among intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–800 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn with black gram had the highest NMR among the intercropping treatments (157467 ₹ ha-1).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
NMRe4
Direction
higheste0
Value
157467 ₹ ha-1e4
Comparator
among intercropping treatmentse6
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e5

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–861 · show in text ↑
e6

“among intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–800 · show in text ↑
e4

“NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn with black gram had the highest B:C ratio among the intercropping treatments (5.23).

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.23e4
Comparator
among intercropping treatmentse6
Setting
Akola (M.S.)e5

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–861 · show in text ↑
e6

“among intercropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–800 · show in text ↑
e4

“B: C ratio (5.23)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“productivity and economics of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–137 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.