Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation significantly increased total nitrogen content of Zea mays leaves compared with noninoculated controls.

A claim from An increase in nitrogen content of Setaria italica and Zea mays inoculated with Azospirillum · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum inoculation significantly increased total nitrogen content of Zea mays leaves compared with noninoculated controls.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
inoculated with Azospirillumt0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillumt0symbiont
Outcome
total nitrogen contente2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
noninoculated controlse3
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“An increase in nitrogen content of Setaria italica and Zea mays inoculated with Azospirillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92
e2

“significantly increased the dry weight of Zea mays and Setaria italica leaves, the total nitrogen content of these leaves (as measured by the Kjeldahl method)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–641
e3

“as compared with the noninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–749
e0

“under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–251

Title

An increase in nitrogen content of Setaria italica and Zea mays inoculated with Azospirillum

Israel Nur; Yaacov Okon; Yigal Henis Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1980. doi:10.1139/m80-080

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e8a826a609cd0c5981683069980a322a33e037ab88b3c5ee8214da09a598d5a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.