Claim · model-written summary
CCC did not affect shoot elongation or shoot dry weight.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shoot elongation and dry weight of shoot were not affected by CCC treatment”
t0“CCC on the Growth of Grapevine”
Title
Physiological Effects of CCC on the Growth of Grapevine
Yoshiyuki NIIMI Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1979. doi:10.2503/jjshs.48.153
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect CCC increased root dry weight.
- Intervention effect CCC did not change external root features.
- Intervention effect CCC reduced the top/root ratio to about half that of controls.
- Intervention effect CCC increased xylem sap volume to over twice the control level.
- Observation At least five cytokinin-like substances including zeatin and zeatin riboside occurred in control xylem sap.
- Intervention effect CCC depressed the main cytokinin-like activity peak.
- Observation A sixth cytokinin-like substance appeared after CCC treatment.
- Intervention effect CCC increased inflorescence differentiation in lateral buds.
- Observation Inflorescence differentiation was greater at nodes 3–5 than nodes 8–10.
- Intervention effect CCC increased leaf chlorophyll content, especially in young leaves.
- Intervention effect CCC stimulated photosynthetic activity in mature leaves.
- Intervention effect CCC did not affect dark respiration.
- Intervention effect CCC increased mature-leaf photorespiration rate and PR/DR ratio.