Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation below I3 with Si3 did not improve crop productivity.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- irrigation level lower than I3 with Si3e0
- Outcome
- crop productivitye0
- Direction
- not showed positive improvemente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It is concluded that plant exhibited positive response at irrigation levels I3 and I4 in combination with foliar-applied Si3 while irrigation level lower than I3 with Si3 was not showed positive improvement in crop productivity.”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Title
Mitigating water stress on wheat through foliar application of silicon
Rafi Qamar Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2020. doi:10.35495/ajab.2019.04.174
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced yield and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced net assimilation rate.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced Si contents in plants.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced leaf water potential.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced root length.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 reduced water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect I1 + Si0 increased evapotranspiration efficiency.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased yield and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased net assimilation rate.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased Si contents in plants.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased leaf water potential.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased root length.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 increased water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect I5 + Si3 reduced evapotranspiration efficiency.
- Intervention effect I4 + Si3 was statistically at par with I5 + Si3 for the reported parameters.
- Intervention effect I3 + Si3 was statistically at par with I5 + Si3 for the reported parameters.
- Observation I3 and I4 with Si3 gave a positive plant response.