Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endive intercropping increased tobacco biomass.

Treatment
intercropping endivee0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
monocropping tobaccoe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant biomass in T1 (intercropping onion), T2 (intercropping endive), and T3 (intercropping lettuce) treatments were significantly higher than those of the controls (monocropping tobacco).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–893

Title

Intercropping system modulated soil–microbe interactions that enhanced the growth and quality of flue-cured tobacco by improving rhizospheric soil nutrients, microbial structure, and enzymatic activities

Muqiu Zhou; Chenglin Sun; Bin Dai; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1233464

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e8f71f4345b0ac475049587702df8b90baad21ed3386f4a8874d2c0ce5933e30 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Cichorium endivia · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.